Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17189864›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2007

Analyzing the ATR-mediated checkpoint using Xenopus egg extracts.

Patrick J Lupardus, Christopher Van, Karlene A Cimprich

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. DNA Damage Response in Xenopus laevis Cell-Free Extracts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Reconstituting Nuclear and Chromosome Dynamics UsingCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Study of the DNA damage checkpoint using Xenopus egg extracts.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick J LupardusDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive , Stanford, CA 94305-5441, USA.
Christopher Van
Karlene A Cimprich
Stanford University · US

Funding

Regulation of the DNA Damage ResponseR01ES016486 · NIEHS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CIMPRICH, KARLENE A · 2007 to 2025
$6.2M
Role of ATR in the DNA Damage ResponseR01GM062193 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CIMPRICH, KARLENE A · 2002 to 2006
$1.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016486NIGMS NIH HHS GM062193NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our knowledge of cell cycle events such as DNA replication and mitosis has been advanced significantly through the use of Xenopus egg extracts as a model system. More recently, Xenopus extracts have been used to investigate the cellular mechanisms that ensure accurate and complete duplication of the genome, processes otherwise known as the DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Here we describe several Xenopus extract methods that have advanced the study of the ATR-mediated checkpoints. These include a protocol for the preparation of nucleoplasmic extract (NPE), which is a soluble extract system useful for studying nuclear events such as DNA replication and checkpoints. In addition, we describe several key assays for studying checkpoint activation as well as methods for using small DNA structures to activate ATR.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell ExtractsDNA ReplicationElectrophoresis, Agar GelOvumPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesXenopusXenopus ProteinsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsAtr protein, XenopusCell Cycle ProteinsCell ExtractsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesXenopus Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17189864
PMCPMC2657337
OpenAlexW2030190587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.