ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2007
Evaluation of features for catalytic residue prediction in novel folds.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- SCREEN: A Graph-based Contrastive Learning Tool to Infer Catalytic Residues and Assess Enzyme Mutations.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Accurately predicting enzyme functions through geometric graph learning on ESMFold-predicted structures.Nature communications · 2024Article
- CATH functional families predict functional sites in proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- The choice of sequence homologs included in multiple sequence alignments has a dramatic impact on evolutionary conservation analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- CSmetaPred: a consensus method for prediction of catalytic residues.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- CRHunter: integrating multifaceted information to predict catalytic residues in enzymes.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- iCataly-PseAAC: Identification of Enzymes Catalytic Sites Using Sequence Evolution Information with Grey Model GM (2,1).The Journal of membrane biology · 2015Article
- Multi-level machine learning prediction of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.PeerJ · 2015Article
- Article
- Biochemical functional predictions for protein structures of unknown or uncertain function.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2015Review
- An improved systematic approach to predicting transcription factor target genes using support vector machine.PloS one · 2014Article
- EXIA2: web server of accurate and rapid protein catalytic residue prediction.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Protein structure based prediction of catalytic residues.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Accurate prediction of protein catalytic residues by side chain orientation and residue contact density.PloS one · 2012Article
- Article
- L1pred: a sequence-based prediction tool for catalytic residues in enzymes with the L1-logreg classifier.PloS one · 2012Article
- Structure-based identification of catalytic residues.Proteins · 2011Article
- Sequence conservation in the prediction of catalytic sites.The protein journal · 2011Article
- Novel feature for catalytic protein residues reflecting interactions with other residues.PloS one · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural genomics projects are determining the three-dimensional structure of proteins without full characterization of their function. A critical part of the annotation process involves appropriate knowledge representation and prediction of functionally important residue environments. We have developed a method to extract features from sequence, sequence alignments, three-dimensional structure, and structural environment conservation, and used support vector machines to annotate homologous and nonhomologous residue positions based on a specific training set of residue functions. In order to evaluate this pipeline for automated protein annotation, we applied it to the challenging problem of prediction of catalytic residues in enzymes. We also ranked the features based on their ability to discriminate catalytic from noncatalytic residues. When applying our method to a well-annotated set of protein structures, we found that top-ranked features were a measure of sequence conservation, a measure of structural conservation, a degree of uniqueness of a residue's structural environment, solvent accessibility, and residue hydrophobicity. We also found that features based on structural conservation were complementary to those based on sequence conservation and that they were capable of increasing predictor performance. Using a family nonredundant version of the ASTRAL 40 v1.65 data set, we estimated that the true catalytic residues were correctly predicted in 57.0% of the cases, with a precision of 18.5%. When testing on proteins containing novel folds not used in training, the best features were highly correlated with the training on families, thus validating the approach to nonhomologous catalytic residue prediction in general. We then applied the method to 2781 coordinate files from the structural genomics target pipeline and identified both highly ranked and highly clustered groups of predicted catalytic residues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.