Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17188855›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2007

To step or not to step? How biochemistry and mechanics influence processivity in Kinesin and Eg5.

Megan T Valentine, Susan P Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Optical Control of Mitosis with a Photoswitchable Eg5 Inhibitor.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. KIF15 nanomechanics and kinesin inhibitors, with implications for cancer chemotherapeutics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anaphase B.Biology · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan T ValentineDepartment of Biological Sciences Stanford University 030 Herrin Labs Stanford, CA 94305 650-724-5536 USA.
Susan P Gilbert

Funding

Mechanistic Analysis of Microtubule Based MotorsR37GM054141 · NIGMS · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI GILBERT, SUSAN P. · 2013 to 2022
$4.4M
Mechanistic Analysis Of Microtubule Based MotorsR01GM054141 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GILBERT, SUSAN P. · 1996 to 2012
$3.8M
Mechanistic Analysis of Microtubule-Based MotorsK02AR047841 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GILBERT, SUSAN P. · 2002 to 2006
$509k
NIAMS NIH HHS K02 AR047841NIAMS NIH HHS K02-AR47841NIGMS NIH HHS GM54141NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054141NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM054141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional kinesin and Eg5 are essential nanoscale motor proteins. Single-molecule and presteady-state kinetic experiments indicate that both motors use similar strategies to generate movement along microtubules, despite having distinctly different in vivo functions. Single molecules of kinesin, a long-distance cargo transporter, are highly processive, binding the microtubule and taking 100 or more sequential steps at velocities of up to 700 nm/s before dissociating, whereas Eg5, a motor active in mitotic spindle assembly, is also processive, but takes fewer steps at a slower rate. By dissecting the structural, biochemical and mechanical features of these proteins, we hope to learn how kinesin and Eg5 are optimized for their specific biological tasks, while gaining insight into how biochemical energy is converted into mechanical work.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDimerizationKinesinsMicrotubulesProtein BindingSpindle ApparatusKinesins

Identifiers

PMID17188855
PMCPMC2270473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.