Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17188219›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Diabetes care among veteran women with disability.

Chin-Lin Tseng, Usha Sambamoorthi, Anjali Tiwari, Mangala Rajan, Patricia Findley, Leonard Pogach

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chin-Lin TsengCenter for Healthcare Knowledge and Management, Veterans Administration New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, New Jersey 07018, USA. tseng@njneuromed.org
Usha Sambamoorthi
Anjali Tiwari
Mangala Rajan
Patricia Findley
Leonard Pogach
VA New Jersey Health Care System · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity Hospital, Newark · US

Funding

EVALUATING A MEDICAID BRAIN INJURY WAIVER PROGRAMK23HD040779 · NICHD · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI FINDLEY, PATRICIA A · 2001 to 2005
$492k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD040779NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD 40779-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to analyze predictors of diabetes care consistent with performance standards among women Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinic users with disability enrollment status.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using VHA and Medicare files of VHA clinic users with diabetes. Diabetes care measures consisted of annual testing for hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and poor HbA(1c) (>9%) and LDL-C (> or =130 mg/dL) control in fiscal year 2000. Chi-square tests and logistic regressions were used to assess subgroup differences in diabetes care. Independent variables included demographic characteristics and physical and psychiatric comorbidities. POPULATION: Study population was based on veteran women <65 years of age who used VHA clinics; we identified 2,344 women as having coexisting disability and diabetes and 2,766 women with diabetes and without disability.

findingsAmong veteran women with diabetes and disability, 65% received > or =1 HbA(1c) test, and 54% received a LDL-C test; 25% and 30% had poor HbA(1c) and LDL-C control, respectively. In logistic regressions, none of the independent variables had significant effects on poor HbA(1c) or LDL-C control, except that African Americans were more likely to have poor HbA(1c) control than whites. Significant age effects were noted in rates of HbA(1c) and LDL testing. Comparison of diabetes care measures between women with and without disability indicated that those with disability were more likely to receive HbA(1c) and LDL-C tests; no significant differences in HbA(1c) and LDL-C control were noted.

conclusionsDisability status of women veterans was not a barrier to diabetes care consistent with performance standards. Our findings suggest that to improve diabetes care, subgroup-specific interventions, rather than a global approach, are warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesComorbidityDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesQuality Assurance, Health CareRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID17188219
PMCPMC1950593
OpenAlexW2024677501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.