Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17188212›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Disability and receipt of clinical preventive services among women.

Wenhui Wei, Patricia A Findley, Usha Sambamoorthi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pap, mammography, and clinical breast examination screening among women with disabilities: a systematic review.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Primary Care Providers' Experiences Recommending and Performing Cervical Cancer Screening for Women with Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cancer Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenhui WeiInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08854, USA. weiwenhui@gmail.com
Patricia A Findley
Usha Sambamoorthi
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USVA New Jersey Health Care System · US

Funding

EVALUATING A MEDICAID BRAIN INJURY WAIVER PROGRAMK23HD040779 · NICHD · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI FINDLEY, PATRICIA A · 2001 to 2005
$492k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD040779NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD40779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore individuals are surviving catastrophic injuries and living longer with persistent disability; however, their receipt of clinical preventive services is not well understood as compared with those without disabilities given the dual focus of care on both primary prevention and the prevention of secondary complications related to their disabilities.

methodsLongitudinal analyses of 1999-2002 Medical Expenditure Survey (MEPS). Study sample consisted of 3,183 community-dwelling women aged 51-64 years and followed for 2 full years. Women with disabilities were defined as having reported any limitation in any area of activity of daily living in 2 years. Recommended clinical preventive services were defined as receiving the following at the recommended intervals: colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer; cholesterol screening; and influenza immunization. chi(2) tests and multiple logistic regressions were used to examine variations in use of clinical preventive services.

resultsOverall, 23% of the women in the study (n = 835) were disabled. Disabled women, however, were less likely to receive mammography and Pap smears within the recommended intervals. However, disabled women were more likely to receive influenza immunization, cholesterol screening, and colorectal screening within the recommended intervals. Among the disabled, usual source of care and health insurance remained significant predictors of receipt of clinical preventive services across all types,

conclusionsDisabled women were less likely to receive some of the cancer screening services, suggesting a need for targeted interventions to promote breast cancer and cervical cancer screening. Increased access to health care insurance and health care providers may also help.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesWomen's HealthBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHealth Maintenance OrganizationsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPreventive Health ServicesUnited StatesVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID17188212
PMCPMC1937503
OpenAlexW2152580936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.