Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17187988›Full record

ReviewJournal of structural biology2007

High performance computing in biology: multimillion atom simulations of nanoscale systems.

K Y Sanbonmatsu, C-S Tung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of structural biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ribosome Mechanics Informs about Mechanism.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multiscale simulation of microbe structure and dynamics.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2011
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K Y SanbonmatsuTheoretical Biology and Biophysics, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS K710, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA. kys@lanl.gov
C-S Tung

Funding

Large-Scale Simulations of Ribosomal DecodingR01GM072686 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI SANBONMATSU, KARISSA Y · 2005 to 2024
$5.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072686NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM072686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational methods have been used in biology for sequence analysis (bioinformatics), all-atom simulation (molecular dynamics and quantum calculations), and more recently for modeling biological networks (systems biology). Of these three techniques, all-atom simulation is currently the most computationally demanding, in terms of compute load, communication speed, and memory load. Breakthroughs in electrostatic force calculation and dynamic load balancing have enabled molecular dynamics simulations of large biomolecular complexes. Here, we report simulation results for the ribosome, using approximately 2.64 million atoms, the largest all-atom biomolecular simulation published to date. Several other nano-scale systems with different numbers of atoms were studied to measure the performance of the NAMD molecular dynamics simulation program on the Los Alamos National Laboratory Q Machine. We demonstrate that multimillion atom systems represent a 'sweet spot' for the NAMD code on large supercomputers. NAMD displays an unprecedented 85% parallel scaling efficiency for the ribosome system on 1024 CPUs. We also review recent targeted molecular dynamics simulations of the ribosome that prove useful for studying conformational changes of this large biomolecular complex in atomic detail.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyComputer SimulationComputing MethodologiesProtein ConformationRibosomes

Identifiers

PMID17187988
PMCPMC1868470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.