ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006
HaploRec: efficient and accurate large-scale reconstruction of haplotypes.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Testing for the footprint of sexually antagonistic polymorphisms in the pseudoautosomal region of a plant sex chromosome pair.Genetics · 2013Article
- Rule-based induction method for haplotype comparison and identification of candidate disease loci.Genome medicine · 2012Article
- Calling amplified haplotypes in next generation tumor sequence data.Genome research · 2012Article
- Article
- Species tree estimation for the late blight pathogen, Phytophthora infestans, and close relatives.PloS one · 2012Article
- The importance of phase information for human genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2011Review
- Simultaneous genotype calling and haplotype phasing improves genotype accuracy and reduces false-positive associations for genome-wide association studies.American journal of human genetics · 2009Article
- Evaluation of haplotype inference using definitive haplotype data obtained from complete hydatidiform moles, and its significance for the analyses of positively selected regions.PLoS genetics · 2009Article
- Genotype determination for polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Missing data imputation and haplotype phase inference for genome-wide association studies.Human genetics · 2008Review
- Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering.American journal of human genetics · 2007Article
- Type 2 diabetes whole-genome association study in four populations: the DiaGen consortium.American journal of human genetics · 2007Article
- ISHAPE: new rapid and accurate software for haplotyping.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
- Constrained hidden Markov models for population-based haplotyping.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaplotypes extracted from human DNA can be used for gene mapping and other analysis of genetic patterns within and across populations. A fundamental problem is, however, that current practical laboratory methods do not give haplotype information. Estimation of phased haplotypes of unrelated individuals given their unphased genotypes is known as the haplotype reconstruction or phasing problem.
resultsWe define three novel statistical models and give an efficient algorithm for haplotype reconstruction, jointly called HaploRec. HaploRec is based on exploiting local regularities conserved in haplotypes: it reconstructs haplotypes so that they have maximal local coherence. This approach--not assuming statistical dependence for remotely located markers--has two useful properties: it is well-suited for sparse marker maps, such as those used in gene mapping, and it can actually take advantage of long maps.
conclusionOur experimental results with simulated and real data show that HaploRec is a powerful method for the large scale haplotyping needed in association studies. With sample sizes large enough for gene mapping it appeared to be the best compared to all other tested methods (Phase, fastPhase, PL-EM, Snphap, Gerbil; simulated data), with small samples it was competitive with the best available methods (real data). HaploRec is several orders of magnitude faster than Phase and comparable to the other methods; the running times are roughly linear in the number of subjects and the number of markers. HaploRec is publicly available at http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/group/genetics/haplotyping.html.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.