How Web 2.0 is changing medicine.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. The role of interdisciplinary research team in the impact of health apps in health and computer science publications: a systematic review.Biomedical engineering online · 2016
   Pooled it
2. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013
   Pooled it
3. The Effects of Website Traits and Medical Skepticism on Patients' Willingness to Follow Web-Based Medical Advice: Web-Based Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022
   Trial
4. The effect of social support features and gamification on a Web-based intervention for rheumatoid arthritis patients: randomized controlled trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015
   Trial
5. The Field's mass shooting: emergency medical services response.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023
   Article
6. YouTube™ as a source of information on extraction of third molars.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2021
   Article
7. Breastfeed4Ghana: Design and evaluation of an innovative social media campaign.Maternal & child nutrition · 2020
   Article
8. 'WhatsAppClinical kidney journal · 2020
   Article
9. The Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers' Cross-Platform Buying Behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2020
   Article
10. Study Comparing Traditional Versus Alternative Metrics to Measure the Impact of the Critical Care Medicine Literature.Critical care explorations · 2019
    Article
11. A comparison of the content and primary literature support for online medication information provided by Lexicomp and Wikipedia.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2018
    Article
12. The Social Media Revolution in Nephrology Education.Kidney international reports · 2018
    Review
13. The Significance of Witness Sensors for Mass Casualty Incidents and Epidemic Outbreaks.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018
    Article
14. Effective uses of social media in public health and medicine: a systematic review of systematic reviews.Online journal of public health informatics · 2018
    Article
15. Is Google Trends a reliable tool for digital epidemiology? Insights from different clinical settings.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2017
    Article
16. Social Media for the Dissemination of Cochrane Child Health Evidence: Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017
    Article
17. Questioning reliability assessments of health information on social media.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2017
    Review
18. The Doktabörse - an innovative online platform for research projects at the medical faculty of the LMU Munich.GMS journal for medical education · 2017
    Article
19. Consumers' Use of UMLS Concepts on Social Media: Diabetes-Related Textual Data Analysis in Blog and Social Q&A Sites.JMIR medical informatics · 2016
    Article
20. Exploratory study of the implications of research on the use of smart connected devices for prevention: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2016
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as