Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17184801›Full record

ReviewToxicology and applied pharmacology2007

Silymarin and epithelial cancer chemoprevention: how close we are to bedside?

Manjinder Kaur, Rajesh Agarwal

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Milk Thistle (Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manjinder KaurDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
Rajesh Agarwal
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

Prostate cancer prevention and treatment by sillibininR01CA102514 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AGARWAL, RAJESH · 2003 to 2013
$3.6M
Colon Cancer Chemoprevention by Flavonoid SilibininR01CA112304 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AGARWAL, RAJESH · 2005 to 2015
$2.9M
Pure Flavonolignans from S. marianum in Prostate CancerR01CA104286 · NCI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI OBERLIES, NICHOLAS H. · 2004 to 2008
$1.9M
Angioprevention of Lung Tumorigenesis by SilibininR01CA113876 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AGARWAL, RAJESH · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
CANCER CHEMOPREVENTION BY SILYMARINR01CA064514 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AGARWAL, RAJESH · 2000 to 2004
$1.2M
Bladder Cancer Prevention by SilibininR03CA099079 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AGARWAL, RAJESH · 2002 to 2003
$150k
CANCER CHEMOPREVENTION BY SILYMARINR29CA064514 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI AGARWAL, RAJESH · 1995 to 1999
–
NCI NIH HHS CA102514NCI NIH HHS CA104286NCI NIH HHS CA112304NCI NIH HHS CA113876NCI NIH HHS CA64514NCI NIH HHS CA99079NCI NIH HHS R01 CA064514NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102514NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112304NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Failure and high systemic toxicity of conventional cancer therapies have accelerated the focus on the search for newer agents, which could prevent and/or slow-down cancer growth and have more human acceptability by being less or non-toxic. Silymarin is one such agent, which has been extensively used since ages for the treatment of liver conditions, and thus has possibly the greatest patient acceptability. In recent years, increasing body of evidence has underscored the cancer preventive efficacy of silymarin in both in vitro and in vivo animal models of various epithelial cancers. Apart from chemopreventive effects, other noteworthy aspects of silymarin and its active constituent silibinin in cancer treatment include their capability to potentiate the efficacy of known chemotherapeutic drugs, as an inhibitor of multidrug resistance-associated proteins and as an adjunct to the cancer therapeutic drugs due to their organ-protective efficacy specifically liver, and immunostimulatory effects. Widespread use of silymarin for liver health in humans and commercial availability of its formulations with increased bioavailability, further underscore the necessity of carrying out controlled clinical trials with these agents in cancer patients. In this review, we will briefly discuss the outcomes of clinical trials being conducted by us and others in cancer patients to provide insight into the clinical relevance of the observed chemopreventive effects of these agents in various epithelial cancer models.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsChemopreventionClinical Trials as TopicEpithelial CellsHumansMolecular StructureNeoplasmsSilymarinTreatment OutcomeAntioxidantsSilymarin

Identifiers

PMID17184801
PMCPMC2692696
OpenAlexW2052328885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.