ArticleTrials2006
Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study.
Article in Trials, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of sample size calculations and reporting in randomized controlled trials in ophthalmology over a 20-year period.International ophthalmology · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- TrialR: critical enablers and the need for reusable Rare Disease Clinical Trial infrastructure in Western Australia.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Natural Medicines for Depression from 2004 to 2024.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Article
- Building on evidence to improve patient care.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Review
- Article
- Treatment costs associated with interventional cancer clinical trials conducted at a single UK institution over 2 years (2009-2010).British journal of cancer · 2013Article
- Solving the challenges of large multicenter trials in anesthesia.HSR proceedings in intensive care & cardiovascular anesthesia · 2009Article
- Workplace restructurings in intervention studies - a challenge for design, analysis and interpretation.BMC medical research methodology · 2008Article
- In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.PLoS medicine · 2008Article
- Marketing and clinical trials: a case study.Trials · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSecuring and managing finances for multicentre randomised controlled trials is a highly complex activity which is rarely considered in the research literature. This paper describes the process of financial negotiation and the impact of financial considerations in four UK multicentre trials. These trials had met, or were on schedule to meet, recruitment targets agreed with their public-sector funders. The trials were considered within a larger study examining factors which might be associated with trial recruitment (STEPS).
methodsIn-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in 2003-04 with 45 individuals with various responsibilities to one of the four trials. Interviewees were recruited through purposive and then snowball sampling. Interview transcripts were analysed with the assistance of the qualitative package Atlas-ti.
resultsThe data suggest that the UK system of dividing funds into research, treatment and NHS support costs brought the trial teams into complicated negotiations with multiple funders. The divisions were somewhat malleable and the funding system was used differently in each trial. The fact that all funders had the potential to influence and shape the trials considered here was an important issue as the perspectives of applicants and funders could diverge. The extent and range of industry involvement in non-industry-led trials was striking. Three broad periods of financial work (foundation, maintenance, and resourcing completion) were identified. From development to completion of a trial, the trialists had to be resourceful and flexible, adapting to changing internal and external circumstances. In each period, trialists and collaborators could face changing costs and challenges. Each trial extended the recruitment period; three required funding extensions from MRC or HTA.
conclusionThis study highlights complex financial aspects of planning and conducting trials, especially where multiple funders are involved. Recognition of the importance of financial stability and of the need for appropriate training in this area should be paralleled by further similar research with a broader range of trials, aimed at understanding and facilitating the conduct of clinical research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.