Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17182341›Full record

GuidelineThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2007

WHO Rapid Advice Guidelines for pharmacological management of sporadic human infection with avian influenza A (H5N1) virus.

Holger J Schünemann, Suzanne R Hill, Meetali Kakad, Richard Bellamy, Timothy M Uyeki, Frederick G Hayden, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, John Beigel, Tawee Chotpitayasunondh, Chris Del Mar and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

Holger J SchünemannItalian National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, INFORMA Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Istituto Regina Elena, Rome, Italy. Schuneh@mcmaster.ca
Suzanne R Hill
Meetali Kakad
Richard Bellamy
Timothy M Uyeki
Frederick G Hayden
Yazdan Yazdanpanah
John Beigel
Tawee Chotpitayasunondh
Chris Del Mar
Jeremy Farrar
Tinh Hien Tran
Bülent Ozbay
Norio Sugaya
Keiji Fukuda
Nikki Shindo
Lauren Stockman
Gunn E Vist
Alice Croisier
Azim Nagjdaliyev
Cathy Roth
Gail Thomson
Howard Zucker
Andrew D Oxman
WHO Rapid Advice Guideline Panel on Avian Influenza
Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten · NOWorld Health Organization · CHBond University · AUCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USCentre Hospitalier de Tourcoing · FRHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNJames Cook University Hospital · GBKeio University · JPNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USQueen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health · THUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Virginia · USVan Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent spread of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus to poultry and wild birds has increased the threat of human infections with H5N1 virus worldwide. Despite international agreement to stockpile antivirals, evidence-based guidelines for their use do not exist. WHO assembled an international multidisciplinary panel to develop rapid advice for the pharmacological management of human H5N1 virus infection in the current pandemic alert period. A transparent methodological guideline process on the basis of the Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop evidence-based guidelines. Our development of specific recommendations for treatment and chemoprophylaxis of sporadic H5N1 infection resulted from the benefits, harms, burden, and cost of interventions in several patient and exposure groups. Overall, the quality of the underlying evidence for all recommendations was rated as very low because it was based on small case series of H5N1 patients, on extrapolation from preclinical studies, and high quality studies of seasonal influenza. A strong recommendation to treat H5N1 patients with oseltamivir was made in part because of the severity of the disease. Similarly, strong recommendations were made to use neuraminidase inhibitors as chemoprophylaxis in high-risk exposure populations. Emergence of other novel influenza A viral subtypes with pandemic potential, or changes in the pathogenicity of H5N1 virus strains, will require an update of these guidelines and WHO will be monitoring this closely.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeWorld Health OrganizationAnimalsAntiviral AgentsBirdsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza in BirdsNeuraminidaseOseltamivirPoultryAntiviral AgentsNeuraminidaseOseltamivir

Identifiers

PMID17182341
PMCPMC7106493
OpenAlexW2105531994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.