Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17180496›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2006

Halotolerance is enhanced in carrot callus by sensing hypergravity: influence of calcium modulators and cytochalasin D.

G F E Scherer

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G F E SchererInstitut für Zierpflanzenbau und Gehölzwissenschaften, Universität Hannover, Hannover, Federal Republic of Germany. scherer@zier.uni-hannover.de
Leibniz University Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carrot callus was centrifuged at 10 g and compared to callus growing at 1 g on agar in the presence of increasing sodium chloride concentrations. Growth after 14 days was enhanced in the centrifuged samples versus samples kept at 1 g. This effect was not found when the samples were grown on potassium chloride. At 50 mM NaCl, the calcium ionophore ionomycin was applied to centrifuged and noncentrifuged callus samples. In both experiments, the growth of callus increased with increasing ionomycin concentrations but under 10 g this increase was more enhanced. As inhibitors of calcium influx, lanthanum and gadolinium chloride were chosen in the presence of 50 mM NaCl. Both inhibitors inhibited growth at 1 g at low concentrations of around 2 microM, whereas the centrifuged samples were not or much less so inhibited. We tested an involvement of actin by application of cytochalasin D to callus grown in the presence of 50 mM NaCl. In both types of samples, growth at 1 g and growth at 10 g, cytochalasin D enhanced growth but the effect was clearly stronger at 10 g than at 1 g. As increased halotolerance was only observed in the presence of increased sodium ions, not potassium ions, and as halotolerance is known to be induced by an influx of calcium, the data suggest that a calcium influx induced by hypergravity and possibly modulated by actin caused the observed increase in halotolerance at 10 g.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalHypergravityActin CytoskeletonCalcium SignalingCentrifugationChloridesCytochalasin DDaucus carotaDose-Response Relationship, DrugGadoliniumGravity SensingIonomycinIonophoresLanthanumMechanotransduction, CellularPotassium ChlorideChloridesCytochalasin DGadoliniumgadolinium chlorideIonomycinIonophoresLanthanumlanthanum chloridePotassium ChlorideSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID17180496
OpenAlexW2095556815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.