Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17180495›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2006

Gravity: one of the driving forces for evolution.

D Volkmann, F Baluska

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An ArabidopsisLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Osteoblast Lineage Support of Hematopoiesis in Health and Disease.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Cytoskeletal Tensegrity in Microgravity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. RNAseq Analysis of the Response ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D VolkmannInstitut für Zelluläre und Molekulare Botanik, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany. unb110@uni-bonn.de
F Baluska

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical load is 10(3) larger for land-living than for water-living organisms. As a consequence, antigravitational material in form of compound materials like lignified cell walls in plants and mineralised bones in animals occurs in land-living organisms preferentially. Besides cellulose, pectic substances of plant cell walls seem to function as antigravitational material in early phases of plant evolution and development. A testable hypothesis including vesicular recycling processes into the tensegrity concept is proposed for both sensing of gravitational force and responding by production of antigravitational material at the cellular level.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionGravitationMechanotransduction, CellularAirAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesCell Physiological PhenomenaCell WallCollagenDurapatiteGravity SensingLigninPectinsPlant Physiological PhenomenaCollagenDurapatitehemicelluloseLigninPectinsPolysaccharidesWater

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.