ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2007
Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in cardiac remodelling.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Global comparison of phosphoproteins in human and rodent hearts: implications for translational studies of myosin light chain and troponin phosphorylations.SpringerPlus · 2016Article
- Calcium handling proteins: structure, function, and modulation by exercise.Heart failure reviews · 2014Article
- Role of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in multifactorial adverse cardiac remodeling associated with metabolic syndrome.Mediators of inflammation · 2013Review
- Phosphoprotein abundance changes in hypertensive cardiac remodeling.Journal of proteomics · 2012Article
- Article
- Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in the heart: angels versus demons in a heart-breaking tale.Physiological reviews · 2010Review
- MAPK signalling in cardiovascular health and disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) are centrally involved in several mechanisms important for heart failure such as apoptosis, activation of inflammatory responses and cell proliferation. We therefore evaluated the effect of the selective p38 MAPK inhibitor SB 239063 on progression of left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction (MI) in rats. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rats were treated for 9 weeks with placebo or SB 239063 by gavage (15 mg kg(-1)) twice daily starting 7 days after ligation of the left anterior descending artery. Serial transthoracic echocardiography was performed at days 7, 36 and 70. KEY
resultsOver the 9 weeks, mortality was not different between the groups. On echocardiography, animals after myocardial infarction exhibited significant left ventricular dilatation as expected (week 10, end-systolic diameter, placebo sham 5.21+/- 0.34 vs. placebo MI 8.44+/- 0.57 mm). However, there was no difference between placebo and SB 239063-treated rats (week 10, end-systolic diameter, SB MI 7.76+/- 0.74 mm, not significantly different from placebo MI). Haemodynamics changed accordingly. Moreover, SB 239063 had no effect on left ventricular hypertrophy. Treatment with SB 239063 significantly reduced cytokine expression of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-1beta after myocardial infarction. However, collagen content was not influenced by the treatment.
conclusionDespite a reduction of inflammation, treatment with the p38 inhibitor SB 239063 does not affect cardiac remodelling and cardiac function when treatment is started 7 days after myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.