Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17179949›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2007

Do studies in caveolin-knockouts teach us about physiology and pharmacology or instead, the ways mice compensate for 'lost proteins'?

P A Insel, H H Patel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Caveolins as Regulators of Stress Adaptation.Molecular pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Lipid raft in cardiac health and disease.Current cardiology reviews · 2009
    Article
  12. Caveolin-1: an ambiguous partner in cell signalling and cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2008
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P A InselDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0636, USA. pinsel@ucsd.edu
H H Patel
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide array of phenotypic changes have been reported in mice with knockout of expression of caveolin-1. Neidhold et al. (2007) describe results in this issue that continue this trend by showing that saphenous arteries from adult caveolin-1 knockout mice lack caveolae, lose beta1-adrenoceptor-promoted relaxation, gain beta3-adrenoceptor-promoted relaxation but show no change in vasomotor response to beta2-adrenoceptor activation. Neither the physiological importance for wild-type animals nor the mechanistic basis for these changes is clear. Although the caveolin-1 knockout and wild-type mice express similar levels of the receptor mRNAs, the protein expression of the receptors is not specified and represents, in our view, an important limitation of the study. We also question the physiological relevance of the findings and ask: Do studies in total body/lifespan caveolin-knockout mice further understanding of physiology and pharmacology or do they primarily characterize secondary consequences? We propose that alternative approaches that decrease caveolin expression in a temporally and spatially discrete manner are more likely to facilitate definitive conclusions regarding caveolin-1 and its role in regulation of beta-adrenoceptors and other pharmacological targets.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalPhenotypeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsCaveolin 1FemaleMaleMiceMice, KnockoutPharmacologyPhysiologyReproducibility of ResultsCaveolin 1

Identifiers

PMID17179949
PMCPMC2013904
OpenAlexW2052870974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.