ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2007
Comparative antagonist pharmacology at the native mouse bradykinin B2 receptor: radioligand binding and smooth muscle contractility studies.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Inflammation signals airway smooth muscle cell proliferation in asthma pathogenesis.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2013Article
- Fasitibant prevents the bradykinin and interleukin 1β synergism on prostaglandin E₂ release and cyclooxygenase 2 expression in human fibroblast-like synoviocytes.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2012Article
- Comparison of the molecular interactions of two antagonists, MEN16132 or icatibant, at the human kinin B₂ receptor.British journal of pharmacology · 2011Article
- Bradykinin and B₂ receptor antagonism in rat and human articular chondrocytes.British journal of pharmacology · 2011Article
- Novel effects mediated by bradykinin and pharmacological characterization of bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism in human synovial fibroblasts.British journal of pharmacology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe aim was to characterize the recently discovered non-peptide antagonist MEN16132 at the mouse B2 receptor, relative to other antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: [3H]-BK binding experiments used mouse lung and ileum tissue membranes and antagonist potency was measured in the isolated ileum contractility assay. KEY
resultsTwo BK binding sites resulted from saturation and homologous competition experiments. A role for the B1 receptor was excluded because of the poor affinity of B1 receptor ligands (pIC50<5). MEN16132, and the other reference antagonists, inhibited only one portion of BK specific binding, and the rank order of potency was (pIC50): Icatibant (lung 10.7; ileum 10.2)=MEN11270 (lung 10.4; ileum 9.9)=MEN16132 (lung 10.5; ileum 9.9).>LF16-0687 (lung 8.9; ileum 8.8)>FR173657 (lung 8.6; ileum 8.2). BK homologous curves performed with lung membranes after treatment with the antagonist MEN16132 or Icatibant (10 nM) displayed only the low affinity site. The functional antagonism by MEN16132 (pA2 9.4) and Icatibant (pA2 9.1), towards BK (control EC50 6.1 nM) induced ileum contractions, was concentration-dependent and surmountable, but the Schild plot slope was less than unity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: In mouse tissue, radiolabelled BK recognizes two binding sites and B2 receptor antagonists can compete only for the higher affinity one. The pharmacological profile of the novel non-peptide antagonist MEN16132 indicates that it exhibits subnanomolar affinity and potency for the mouse B2 receptor and is suitable for further characterization in in vivo pathophysiological models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.