Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17179213›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Reengineering CCA-adding enzymes to function as (U,G)- or dCdCdA-adding enzymes or poly(C,A) and poly(U,G) polymerases.

Hyundae D Cho, Christophe L M J Verlinde, Alan M Weiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Two complementingRNA biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Acquisition ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Evolution of tRNA nucleotidyltransferases: a small deletion generated CC-adding enzymes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  16. Article
  17. RNA-specific ribonucleotidyl transferases.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2007
    Review
  18. Controlling translation via modulation of tRNA levels.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyundae D ChoDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7350, USA.
Christophe L M J Verlinde
Alan M Weiner

Funding

THE CCA-ADDING ENZYME (tRNA NUCLEOTIDYL TRANSFERASE)R01GM059804 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WEINER, ALAN M · 1999 to 2006
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM059804NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CCA-adding enzymes build and repair the 3'-terminal CCA sequence of tRNA. These unusual RNA polymerases use either a ribonucleoprotein template (class I) or pure protein template (class II) to form mock base pairs with the Watson-Crick edges of incoming CTP and ATP. Guided by the class II Bacillus stearothermophilus CCA-adding enzyme structure, we introduced mutations designed to reverse the polarity of hydrogen bonds between the nucleobases and protein template. We were able to transform the CCA-adding enzyme into a (U,G)-adding enzyme that incorporates UTP and GTP instead of CTP and ATP; we transformed the related Aquifex aeolicus CC- and A-adding enzymes into UU- and G-adding enzymes and Escherichia coli poly(A) polymerase into a poly(G) polymerase; and we transformed the B. stearothermophilus CCA-adding enzyme into a poly(C,A) polymerase by mutations in helix J that appear, based on the apoenzyme structure, to sterically limit addition to CCA. We also transformed the B. stearothermophilus CCA-adding enzyme into a dCdCdA-adding enzyme by mutating an arginine that interacts with the incoming ribose 2' hydroxyl. Most importantly, we found that mutations in helix J can affect the specificity of the nucleotide binding site some 20 A away, suggesting that the specificity of both class I and II enzymes may be dictated by an intricate network of hydrogen bonds involving the protein, incoming nucleotide, and 3' end of the tRNA. Collaboration between RNA and protein in the form of a ribonucleoprotein template may help to explain the evolutionary diversity of the nucleotidyltransferase family.

Indexed as

Binding SitesHydrogen BondingPoly APoly CPoly GPolynucleotide AdenylyltransferasePoly UProtein EngineeringRNA NucleotidyltransferasesA adding enzymeCC adding enzymePoly Apoly(A-C)Poly CPoly Gpoly G polymerasePolynucleotide AdenylyltransferasePoly Upoly(U-G)RNA NucleotidyltransferasestRNA nucleotidyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID17179213
PMCPMC1765476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.