Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17178796›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007

Two-year assessment of entecavir resistance in Lamivudine-refractory hepatitis B virus patients reveals different clinical outcomes depending on the resistance substitutions present.

Daniel J Tenney, Ronald E Rose, Carl J Baldick, Steven M Levine, Kevin A Pokornowski, Ann W Walsh, Jie Fang, Cheng-Fang Yu, Sharon Zhang, Charles E Mazzucco and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00531167 (Prospective Randomized Study for the Comparison of Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil and Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
17.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00531167 phase4completednot on this map

Prospective Randomized Study for the Comparison of Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil and Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B

TypeinterventionalSponsorKorea UniversityRan2007 to 2012Enrolled219ConditionsChronic Hepatitis BArmscombination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 239 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Management of chronic hepatitis B: Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver consensus guidelines.Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie · 2012
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel J TenneyBristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, 5 Research Parkway, Wallingford, CT 06492, USA. daniel.tenney@bms.com
Ronald E Rose
Carl J Baldick
Steven M Levine
Kevin A Pokornowski
Ann W Walsh
Jie Fang
Cheng-Fang Yu
Sharon Zhang
Charles E Mazzucco
Betsy Eggers
Mayla Hsu
Mary Jane Plym
Patricia Poundstone
Joanna Yang
Richard J Colonno
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Entecavir (ETV) is a deoxyguanosine analog approved for use for the treatment of chronic infection with wild-type and lamivudine-resistant (LVDr) hepatitis B virus (HBV). In LVD-refractory patients, 1.0 mg ETV suppressed HBV DNA levels to below the level of detection by PCR (<300 copies/ml) in 21% and 34% of patients by Weeks 48 and 96, respectively. Prior studies showed that virologic rebound due to ETV resistance (ETVr) required preexisting LVDr HBV reverse transcriptase substitutions M204V and L180M plus additional changes at T184, S202, or M250. To monitor for resistance, available isolates from 192 ETV-treated patients were sequenced, with phenotyping performed for all isolates with all emerging substitutions, in addition to isolates from all patients experiencing virologic rebounds. The T184, S202, or M250 substitution was found in LVDr HBV at baseline in 6% of patients and emerged in isolates from another 11/187 (6%) and 12/151 (8%) ETV-treated patients by Weeks 48 and 96, respectively. However, use of a more sensitive PCR assay detected many of the emerging changes at baseline, suggesting that they originated during LVD therapy. Only a subset of the changes in ETVr isolates altered their susceptibilities, and virtually all isolates were significantly replication impaired in vitro. Consequently, only 2/187 (1%) patients experienced ETVr rebounds in year 1, with an additional 14/151 (9%) patients experiencing ETVr rebounds in year 2. Isolates from all 16 patients with rebounds were LVDr and harbored the T184 and/or S202 change. Seventeen other novel substitutions emerged during ETV therapy, but none reduced the susceptibility to ETV or resulted in a rebound. In summary, ETV was effective in LVD-refractory patients, with resistant sequences arising from a subset of patients harboring preexisting LVDr/ETVr variants and with approximately half of the patients experiencing a virologic rebound.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCells, CulturedDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA, ViralDouble-Blind MethodDrug Resistance, ViralGuanineHepatitis BHepatitis B virusHumansLamivudineMutationPlasmidsTreatment OutcomeVirus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA, ViralentecavirGuanineLamivudine

Identifiers

PMID17178796
PMCPMC1803124
OpenAlexW2139575022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.