Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17177040›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2007

The impact of an educational DVD on cancer patients considering participation in a phase I clinical trial.

Elizabeth L Strevel, Colin Newman, Gregory R Pond, Martha MacLean, Lillian L Siu

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IEvaluation StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A DVD program on fall prevention skills training for cancer family caregivers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012
    Article
  13. Communication and informed consent in phase 1 trials: a review of the literature from January 2005 to July 2009.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2010
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth L StrevelDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Suite 5-718, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Colin Newman
Gregory R Pond
Martha MacLean
Lillian L Siu
Princess Margaret Hospital · NZUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of workThe quality of informed consent in phase I trials is controversial, partially due to gaps in patient understanding. We assessed an educational DVD's impact on knowledge and satisfaction in cancer patients newly referred to a phase I clinic. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-nine patients were randomly assigned to view an educational DVD (n = 22) which explained phase I trials or a placebo DVD (n = 27). Patients completed a questionnaire assessing knowledge of phase I studies and satisfaction with the DVD. The blinded interviewing physician (n = 8) rated the patient's understanding of phase I trials. MAIN

resultsThe mean patient age was 56; 61% were male. Patients who viewed the educational DVD were less likely to believe that phase I trials determine drug efficacy (p = 0.019), more likely to know that phase I drugs have not been thoroughly studied in humans (p = 0.003), and less likely to believe that these agents have proven activity against human cancers (p = 0.008). More patients who viewed the educational DVD agreed/strongly agreed that the DVD provided useful information (p < 0.001), were confident in their knowledge of phase I trials (p = 0.031), felt aided in their decision to enter a phase I study (p = 0.011), and would have more questions for their physicians because of the DVD (p = 0.017). No statistically significant difference in physician perception of patient understanding or phase I trial accrual was observed between the educational and placebo DVD groups.

conclusionsAn educational DVD increased patient knowledge and satisfaction regarding participation in phase I clinical trials.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationProgram EvaluationVideotape RecordingAntineoplastic AgentsEducational StatusFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPerceptionAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID17177040
OpenAlexW2083315959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.