Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17176036›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry2006

Regulation of DNA repair fidelity by molecular checkpoints: "gates" in DNA polymerase beta's substrate selection.

Ravi Radhakrishnan, Karunesh Arora, Yanli Wang, William A Beard, Samuel H Wilson, Tamar Schlick

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Substrate-induced DNA polymerase β activation.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why nature really chose phosphate.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2013
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ravi RadhakrishnanDepartment of Chemistry and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, New York 10012, USA.
Karunesh Arora
Yanli Wang
William A Beard
Samuel H Wilson
Tamar Schlick
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Nucleic Acid Enzymes--Pol Beta And Base Repair EnzymesZ01ES050158 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WILSON, SAMUEL H · 1997 to 2008
$2.8M
Modeling Chromatin Organization and FunctionR01GM055164 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SCHLICK, TAMAR · 1998 to 2015
$2.6M
Mechanisms of DNA PolymerasesR01ES012692 · NIEHS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SCHLICK, TAMAR · 2005 to 2007
$843k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES050158NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012692NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM055164NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM55164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an increasing number of structural, kinetic, and modeling studies of diverse DNA polymerases in various contexts, a complex dynamical view of how atomic motions might define molecular "gates" or checkpoints that contribute to polymerase specificity and efficiency is emerging. Such atomic-level information can offer insights into rate-limiting conformational and chemical steps to help piece together mechanistic views of polymerases in action. With recent advances, modeling and dynamics simulations, subject to the well-appreciated limitations, can access transition states and transient intermediates along a reaction pathway, both conformational and chemical, and such information can help bridge the gap between experimentally determined equilibrium structures and mechanistic enzymology data. Focusing on DNA polymerase beta (pol beta), we present an emerging view of the geometric, energetic, and dynamic selection criteria governing insertion rate and fidelity mechanisms of DNA polymerases, as gleaned from various computational studies and based on the large body of existing kinetic and structural data. The landscape of nucleotide insertion for pol beta includes conformational changes, prechemistry, and chemistry "avenues", each with a unique deterministic or stochastic pathway that includes checkpoints for selective control of nucleotide insertion efficiency. For both correct and incorrect incoming nucleotides, pol beta's conformational rearrangements before chemistry include a cascade of slow and subtle side chain rearrangements, followed by active site adjustments to overcome higher chemical barriers, which include critical ion-polymerase geometries; this latter notion of a prechemistry avenue fits well with recent structural and NMR data. The chemical step involves an associative mechanism with several possibilities for the initial proton transfer and for the interaction among the active site residues and bridging water molecules. The conformational and chemical events and associated barriers define checkpoints that control enzymatic efficiency and fidelity. Understanding the nature of such active site rearrangements can facilitate interpretation of existing data and stimulate new experiments that aim to probe enzyme features that contribute to fidelity discrimination across various polymerases via such geometric, dynamic, and energetic selection criteria.

Indexed as

DNA RepairDNA Polymerase betaHumansModels, MolecularNucleotidesSubstrate SpecificityDNA Polymerase betaNucleotides

Identifiers

PMID17176036
PMCPMC1945116
OpenAlexW2085312804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.