Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17172673›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2006

The unfolded protein response.

Martin Schröder

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Toxoplasma-host endoplasmic reticulum interaction: HowCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Animal Models for the Study of Gaucher Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. What Is Our Current Understanding of PrPPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin SchröderSchool of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom. martin.schroeder@durham.ac.uk
Durham University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C513418/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a signal transduction network activated by inhibition of protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The UPR coordinates adaptive responses to this stress situation, including induction of ER resident molecular chaperone and protein foldase expression to increase the protein folding capacity of the ER, induction of phospholipid synthesis, attenuation of general translation, and upregulation of ER-associated degradation to decrease the unfolded protein load of the ER, and an antioxidant response. Upon severe or prolonged ER stress the UPR induces apoptosis to eliminate unhealthy cells from an organism or a population. In this review, I will summarize our current knowledge about signal transduction pathways involved in transducing the unfolded protein signal from the ER to the nucleus or the cytosol.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingSignal TransductionAnimalsApoptosisCell NucleusEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansRecombinant ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17172673
OpenAlexW2035089523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.