Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17172667›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2006

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a protein expression system for pharmaceutical and biotechnological proteins.

Christoph Griesbeck, Iris Kobl, Markus Heitzer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Recombinant Protein Production and Purification of Insoluble Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Potential for Microalgae as Bioreactors to Produce Pharmaceuticals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christoph GriesbeckCenter of Excellence for Fluorescent Bioanalysis, Josef-Engert-Str. 9, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany. christoph.griesbeck@mci.edu
Iris Kobl
Markus Heitzer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant proteins have become more and more important for the pharmaceutical and chemical industry. Although various systems for protein expression have been developed, there is an increasing demand for inexpensive methods of large-scale production. Eukaryotic algae could serve as a novel option for the manufacturing of recombinant proteins, as they can be cultivated in a cheap and easy manner and grown to high cell densities. Being a model organism, the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has been studied intensively over the last decades and offers now a complete toolset for genetic manipulation. Recently, the successful expression of several proteins with pharmaceutical relevance has been reported from the nuclear and the chloroplastic genome of this alga, demonstrating its ability for biotechnological applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiotechnologyChlamydomonas reinhardtiiDrug IndustryProtein BiosynthesisRecombinant ProteinsTransformation, GeneticTransgenesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17172667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.