Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17172323›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2007

Genome analyses of three strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: evidence of rapid evolution of chromosome II.

M Choudhary, Xie Zanhua, Y X Fu, S Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Probing the core metabolism ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  2. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Divided Bacterial Genome: Structure, Function, and Evolution.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The MaSuRCA genome assembler.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M ChoudharyDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, The University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Xie Zanhua
Y X Fu
S Kaplan

Funding

INDUCTION AND BIOGENESIS OF SUBCELLULAR ORGANELLESR01GM015590 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KAPLAN, SAMUEL · 1985 to 2008
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM15590-37NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM015590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides of diverse origin have been under investigation in our laboratory for their genome complexities, including the presence of multiple chromosomes and the distribution of essential genes within their genomes. The genome of R. sphaeroides 2.4.1 has been completely sequenced and fully annotated, and now two additional strains (ATCC 17019 and ATCC 17025) of R. sphaeroides have been sequenced. Thus, genome comparisons have become a useful approach in determining the evolutionary relationships among different strains of R. sphaeroides. In this study, the concatenated chromosomal sequences from the three strains of R. sphaeroides were aligned, using Mauve, to examine the extent of shared DNA regions and the degree of relatedness among their chromosome-specific DNA sequences. In addition, the exact intra- and interchromosomal DNA duplications were analyzed using Mummer. Genome analyses employing these two independent approaches revealed that strain ATCC 17025 diverged considerably from the other two strains, 2.4.1 and ATCC 17029, and that the two latter strains are more closely related to one another. Results further demonstrated that chromosome II (CII)-specific DNA sequences of R. sphaeroides have rapidly evolved, while CI-specific DNA sequences have remained highly conserved. Aside from the size variation of CII of R. sphaeroides, variation in sequence lengths of the CII-shared DNA regions and their high sequence divergence among strains of R. sphaeroides suggest the involvement of CII in the evolution of strain-specific genomic rearrangements, perhaps requiring strains to adapt in specialized niches.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, BacterialEvolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialConserved SequenceDNA, BacterialGene DuplicationGene RearrangementRhodobacter sphaeroidesDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID17172323
PMCPMC1855717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.