ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2007
DNA cleavage and Trp53 differentially affect SINE transcription.
Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of B1 antisense RNA on the proliferation and killing tumor ability of aged mouse spleen lymphocytes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Cluster of Evolutionarily Recent KRAB Zinc Finger Proteins Protects Cancer Cells from Replicative Stress-Induced Inflammation.Cancer research · 2024Article
- The abscopal effect: a sense of DNA damage is in the air.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Review
- Tumor suppressor p53: from engaging DNA to target gene regulation.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Endogenous Retroelements and the Host Innate Immune Sensors.Advances in immunology · 2016Review
- Restricting retrotransposons: a review.Mobile DNA · 2016Review
- p53 cooperates with DNA methylation and a suicidal interferon response to maintain epigenetic silencing of repeats and noncoding RNAs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Among the cellular responses observed following treatment with DNA-damaging agents is the activation of Short Interspersed Elements (SINEs; retrotransposable genetic elements that comprise over 10% of the human genome). By placing a human SINE (the Alu element) into murine cells, we have previously shown that DNA-damaging agents such as etoposide can induce both upregulation of SINE transcript levels and SINE retrotransposition. A similarly cytotoxic (but not genotoxic) exposure to vincristine was not associated with SINE activation. Here we demonstrate that multiple other genotoxic exposures are associated with upregulation of SINE transcript levels. By comparing the effects of similarly cytotoxic doses of the topoisomerase II inhibitors etoposide and merbarone, we confirm that DNA strand breakage is specifically associated with SINE induction. By evaluating transcription rate and RNA stability, we demonstrate that SINE induction by genotoxic exposure is associated with transcriptional induction and not with transcript stabilization. Finally we demonstrate that SINE induction by genotoxic stress is mediated by a Trp53-independent pathway, and in fact that Trp53 plays an inhibitory role in attenuating the transcriptional induction of SINE elements following exposure to a genotoxic agent. Together these data support a model in which initial DNA damage can trigger genomic instability due to SINE activation, a response which may be amplified in cancer cells lacking functional TP53.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.