Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17171388›Full record

ReviewDie Naturwissenschaften2007

Behavioral genomics of honeybee foraging and nest defense.

Greg J Hunt, Gro V Amdam, David Schlipalius, Christine Emore, Nagesh Sardesai, Christie E Williams, Olav Rueppell, Ernesto Guzmán-Novoa, Miguel Arechavaleta-Velasco, Sathees Chandra and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insects · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Top-Down Coercive Mechanisms and the Major Transitions in Evolution.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Tyramine and itseLife · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genomic regions influencing aggressive behavior in honey bees are defined by colony allele frequencies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Greg J HuntDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. ghunt@purdue.edu
Gro V Amdam
David Schlipalius
Christine Emore
Nagesh Sardesai
Christie E Williams
Olav Rueppell
Ernesto Guzmán-Novoa
Miguel Arechavaleta-Velasco
Sathees Chandra
M Kim Fondrk
Martin Beye
Robert E Page
Purdue University West Lafayette · USArizona State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USAutonomous University of Queretaro · MXHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DERoosevelt University · USUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · US

Funding

THE MATHEMATICAL DEMOGRAPHY OF BIODEMOGRAPHYP01AG022500 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI CAREY, JAMES R. · 2003 to 2010
$8.1M
GENETIC DISSECTION OF AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR OF HONEY BEESR29GM054850 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI HUNT, GREG J · 1996 to 2000
$89k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG022500NIA NIH HHS P01 AG22500NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM054850NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM548580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The honeybee has been the most important insect species for study of social behavior. The recently released draft genomic sequence for the bee will accelerate honeybee behavioral genetics. Although we lack sufficient tools to manipulate this genome easily, quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that influence natural variation in behavior have been identified and tested for their effects on correlated behavioral traits. We review what is known about the genetics and physiology of two behavioral traits in honeybees, foraging specialization (pollen versus nectar), and defensive behavior, and present evidence that map-based cloning of genes is more feasible in the bee than in other metazoans. We also present bioinformatic analyses of candidate genes within QTL confidence intervals (CIs). The high recombination rate of the bee made it possible to narrow the search to regions containing only 17-61 predicted peptides for each QTL, although CIs covered large genetic distances. Knowledge of correlated behavioral traits, comparative bioinformatics, and expression assays facilitated evaluation of candidate genes. An overrepresentation of genes involved in ovarian development and insulin-like signaling components within pollen foraging QTL regions suggests that an ancestral reproductive gene network was co-opted during the evolution of foraging specialization. The major QTL influencing defensive/aggressive behavior contains orthologs of genes involved in central nervous system activity and neurogenesis. Candidates at the other two defensive-behavior QTLs include modulators of sensory signaling (Am5HT(7) serotonin receptor, AmArr4 arrestin, and GABA-B-R1 receptor). These studies are the first step in linking natural variation in honeybee social behavior to the identification of underlying genes.

Indexed as

Genetics, BehavioralGenomeAnimalsBeesChromosome MappingCloning, MolecularFeeding BehaviorNesting BehaviorQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID17171388
PMCPMC1829419
OpenAlexW2114145948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.