Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17170610›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2006

Efficacy and safety of irbesartan/HCTZ combination therapy as initial treatment for rapid control of severe hypertension.

Joel M Neutel, Stanley S Franklin, Suzanne Oparil, Amitabha Bhaumik, Agata Ptaszynska, Pablo Lapuerta

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A randomized controlled trial on home blood pressure monitoring and quality of care in stage 2 and 3 hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Economic evaluation of irbesartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension in Greece.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Combination therapy in hypertension: An update.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2010
    Article
  14. The clock is ticking: the case for achieving more rapid control of hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2010
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel M NeutelOrange County Heart Institute and Research Center, 14351 Myford Road, Tustin, CA 92780, USA. jmneutel@aol.com
Stanley S Franklin
Suzanne Oparil
Amitabha Bhaumik
Agata Ptaszynska
Pablo Lapuerta
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DEUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USOrange County Heart Institute and Research Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe hypertension is difficult to control. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter trial compared efficacy and safety of once-daily irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy with irbesartan monotherapy in severe hypertension. Patients who were untreated or uncontrolled on monotherapy (seated diastolic blood pressure [BP] > or =110 mm Hg) received fixed-dose irbesartan 150 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg combination therapy for 7 weeks, force-titrated to irbesartan 300 mg/HCTZ 25 mg at week 1 (n=468); or irbesartan 150 mg monotherapy, force-titrated to 300 mg at week 1 (n=269). Significantly more patients on combination therapy achieved seated diastolic BP <90 mm Hg at week 5 (primary end point) compared with monotherapy recipients (47.2% vs 33.2%; P=.0005). Likewise, significantly more patients attained goals per the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) (<140/90 mm Hg) at week 5 (34.6% vs 19.2%, respectively; P<.0001), while the mean difference between combination and monotherapy in seated diastolic BP and seated systolic BP was 4.7 mm Hg and 9.7 mm Hg (P<.0001). Greater and more rapid BP reduction with irbesartan/HCTZ was achieved without additional side effects.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionIrbesartanMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsHydrochlorothiazideIrbesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID17170610
PMCPMC8109498
OpenAlexW2065967117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.