Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17170051›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2007

Clinical trial of a leucotriene B4 receptor antagonist, BIIL 284, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Federico Díaz-González, Rieke H E Alten, William G Bensen, Jacques P Brown, John T Sibley, Maxime Dougados, Stefano Bombardieri, Patrick Durez, Pablo Ortiz, Gonzalo de-Miquel and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Lipidomic Profiling in Synovial Tissue.Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Systemic leukotriene BThe Journal of physiology · 2016
    Article
  11. Persisting eicosanoid pathways in rheumatic diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Federico Díaz-GonzálezService of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
Rieke H E Alten
William G Bensen
Jacques P Brown
John T Sibley
Maxime Dougados
Stefano Bombardieri
Patrick Durez
Pablo Ortiz
Gonzalo de-Miquel
Alexander Staab
Ralf Sigmund
Laurence Salin
Caroline Leledy
Stephen H Polmar
Boehringer Ingelheim (France) · FRBoehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (Spain) · ESBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpital Cochin · FRHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAOspedale Santa Chiara · ITOsteoporosis Canada · CARoyal University Hospital · CASchlosspark-Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral clinical and experimental lines of evidence suggest that leucotriene B4 (LTB4), an arachidonic acid derivative with potent proinflammatory properties, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of BIIL 284, an oral long-acting LTB4 receptor antagonist, as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active RA.

methodsThis was a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients with active RA of 3 months' duration. A total of 342 patients were randomised to receive 5 mg, 25 mg or 75 mg of BIIL 284 or placebo. The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20.

resultsAlthough a higher percentage of ACR 20 responders was observed in the groups treated with 25 mg and 75 mg of BIIL 284 compared with those treated with placebo, no statistically significant differences were found between any of the three active treatment groups compared with the placebo group with regard to the primary or secondary end points. All trial treatments were safe and well tolerated.

conclusionsThis clinical trial demonstrates that treatment of patients with active RA with a potent oral long-acting LTB4 receptor antagonist produced only modest improvements in disease activity. The results of this trial support the conclusion that LTB4 is not a major contributor to the inflammatory process in RA.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedAmidinesArthritis, RheumatoidCarbamatesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Leukotriene B4Treatment OutcomeamelubantAmidinesCarbamatesReceptors, Leukotriene B4

Identifiers

PMID17170051
PMCPMC1954613
OpenAlexW2029552477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.