Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17169140›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2006

Blood glucose measurements in the critically ill: more than just a blood draw.

Frank M Brunkhorst, Hans G Wahl

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Accuracy of Blood Glucose Measurement and Blood Glucose Targets.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Plasma-generating glucose monitor accuracy demonstrated in an animal model.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2009
    Article
  10. An overview of hypoglycemia in the critically ill.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2009
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Current status of tight blood sugar control.Current infectious disease reports · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Frank M BrunkhorstDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich-Schiller University, Erlanger Allee, 07747 Jena, Germany. frank.brunkhorst@med.uni-jena.de
Hans G Wahl
Klinikum Lüdenscheid · DESchiller International University · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A crucial determinant for the success of intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients is the frequent and accurate measurement of blood glucose values with immediate feedback of results. In general, therefore, this is achieved by point-of-care testing, raising the question of the best way of monitoring blood glucose. Corstjens and coworkers, in the previous issue of Critical Care, demonstrate that, in spite of good correlation to "conventional" laboratory glucose assessment, absolute glucose levels may differ systematically. This commentary reviews the problems of glucose measurements arising from matrix effects, interferences and the use of different assays.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseCalibrationCritical IllnessHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMonitoring, PhysiologicPoint-of-Care SystemsReproducibility of ResultsBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID17169140
PMCPMC1794478
OpenAlexW1885432951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.