ArticleCroatian medical journal2006
Subtelomeric chromosome rearrangements in children with idiopathic mental retardation: applicability of three molecular-cytogenetic methods.
Article in Croatian medical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of two subtelomeric assays for the screening of chromosomal rearrangements: analysis of 383 patients, literature review and further recommendations.Journal of applied genetics · 2016Review
- Screening for Subtelomeric Rearrangements in Thai Patients with Intellectual Disabilities Using FISH and Review of Literature on Subtelomeric FISH in 15,591 Cases with Intellectual Disabilities.Genetics research international · 2016Article
- Absence of subtelomeric rearrangements in selected patients with mental retardation as assessed by multiprobe T FISH.Journal of negative results in biomedicine · 2012Article
- "Familial" versus "sporadic" intellectual disability: contribution of subtelomeric rearrangements.Molecular cytogenetics · 2012Article
- Use of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) in screening of subtelomeric regions in children with idiopathic mental retardation.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo identify cryptic subtelomeric rearrangement, a possible cause of idiopathic mental retardation by means of multiprobe telomere fluorescent in situ hybridization (T-FISH).
methodsHundred patients (median age 3.0 years) with mental retardation and dysmorphic features were screened using specific T-FISH probes. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and comparative genomic hybridization were used for the confirmation of results.
resultsTelomere fluorescent in situ hybridization revealed 11 subtelomeric abnormalities in 10 patients (10%; 95% CI, 5.0-17.5). Four of these had only a deletion of subtelomere 2q, which was apparently a normal variant. Among 6 true aberrations (6%; 95% CI, 2.5-12.5) we found 2 de novo subtelomeric deletions and 4 unbalanced subtelomeric rearrangements (one de novo). All clinically significant subtelomeric rearrangements were confirmed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Comparative genomic hybridization was used to investigate the whole genome of patients in whom a subtelomeric anomaly was found, confirming some, but not all subtelomeric rearrangements.
conclusionTelomere fluorescent in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification are both very useful and interchangeable methods for detection of unbalanced chromosome rearrangements, but T-FISH also detects balanced rearrangements. In our experiment the resolution power of comparative genomic hybridization was too low for subtelomeric screening compared with T-FISH and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17167856PMC2080485W2128200221What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.