ArticleBMC structural biology2006
Analysis of an optimal hidden Markov model for secondary structure prediction.
Article in BMC structural biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- MHTAPred-SS: A Highly Targeted Autoencoder-Driven Deep Multi-Task Learning Framework for Accurate Protein Secondary Structure Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Complementarity of the residue-level protein function and structure predictions in human proteins.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Protein secondary structure prediction using a small training set (compact model) combined with a Complex-valued neural network approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- SPINE X: improving protein secondary structure prediction by multistep learning coupled with prediction of solvent accessible surface area and backbone torsion angles.Journal of computational chemistry · 2012Article
- Exact distribution of a pattern in a set of random sequences generated by a Markov source: applications to biological data.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2010Article
- Impact of residue accessible surface area on the prediction of protein secondary structures.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- An evolutionary method for learning HMM structure: prediction of protein secondary structure.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
- Analysis of an optimal hidden Markov model for secondary structure prediction.BMC structural biology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecondary structure prediction is a useful first step toward 3D structure prediction. A number of successful secondary structure prediction methods use neural networks, but unfortunately, neural networks are not intuitively interpretable. On the contrary, hidden Markov models are graphical interpretable models. Moreover, they have been successfully used in many bioinformatic applications. Because they offer a strong statistical background and allow model interpretation, we propose a method based on hidden Markov models.
resultsOur HMM is designed without prior knowledge. It is chosen within a collection of models of increasing size, using statistical and accuracy criteria. The resulting model has 36 hidden states: 15 that model alpha-helices, 12 that model coil and 9 that model beta-strands. Connections between hidden states and state emission probabilities reflect the organization of protein structures into secondary structure segments. We start by analyzing the model features and see how it offers a new vision of local structures. We then use it for secondary structure prediction. Our model appears to be very efficient on single sequences, with a Q3 score of 68.8%, more than one point above PSIPRED prediction on single sequences. A straightforward extension of the method allows the use of multiple sequence alignments, rising the Q3 score to 75.5%.
conclusionThe hidden Markov model presented here achieves valuable prediction results using only a limited number of parameters. It provides an interpretable framework for protein secondary structure architecture. Furthermore, it can be used as a tool for generating protein sequences with a given secondary structure content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.