Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17165101›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2007

How a neuropsychiatric brain bank should be run: a consensus paper of Brainnet Europe II.

A Schmitt, M Bauer, H Heinsen, W Feiden, Consortium of Brainnet Europe II, P Falkai, I Alafuzoff, T Arzberger, S Al-Sarraj, J E Bell and 17 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Immunohistochemical markers for quantitative studies of neurons and glia in human neocortex.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2008
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 19 institutions in 10 countries.

A SchmittDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. aschmit@qwdg.de
M Bauer
H Heinsen
W Feiden
Consortium of Brainnet Europe II
P Falkai
I Alafuzoff
T Arzberger
S Al-Sarraj
J E Bell
N Bogdanovic
W Brück
H Budka
I Ferrer
G Giaccone
G G Kovacs
D Meyronet
M Palkovits
P Parchi
E Patsouris
R Ravid
R Reynolds
P Riederer
W Roggendorf
A Schwalber
D Seilhean
H Kretzschmar
University of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEBellvitge University Hospital · ESCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon · FRFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITGABO:mi · DEHungarian National Bank · HUImperial College London · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEKing's College London · GBLeipzig University · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSaarland University · DESorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new molecular and neurobiological methods, computer-assisted quantification techniques and neurobiological investigation methods which can be applied to the human brain, all have evoked an increased demand for post-mortem tissue in research. Psychiatric disorders are considered to be of neurobiological origin. Thus far, however, the etiology and pathophysiology of schizophrenia, depression and dementias are not well understood at the cellular and molecular level. The following will outline the consensus of the working group for neuropsychiatric brain banking organized in the Brainnet Europe II, on ethical guidelines for brain banking, clinical diagnostic criteria, the minimal clinical data set of retrospectively analyzed cases as well as neuropathological standard investigations to perform stageing for neurodegenerative disorders in brain tissue. We will list regions of interest for assessments in psychiatric disorder, propose a dissection scheme and describe preservation and storage conditions of tissue. These guidelines may be of value for future implementations of additional neuropsychiatric brain banks world-wide.

Indexed as

BrainConsensusDissectionEuropeHumansMental DisordersMolecular BiologyNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurologyPathologyPsychiatrySocieties, MedicalTissue BanksTissue Fixation

Identifiers

PMID17165101
OpenAlexW2003086768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.