Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17164695›Full record

Trial reportTherapeutic drug monitoring2006

Pharmacokinetics of digoxin cross-reacting substances in patients with acute yellow Oleander (Thevetia peruviana) poisoning, including the effect of activated charcoal.

Darren M Roberts, Emma Southcott, Julia M Potter, Michael S Roberts, Michael Eddleston, Nick A Buckley

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Antidotes for acute cardenolide (cardiac glycoside) poisoning.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacological treatment of cardiac glycoside poisoning.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Drug structure-transport relationships.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2010
    Review
  10. Activated charcoal for acute poisoning: one toxicologist's journey.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2010
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Darren M RobertsSouth Asian Clinical Toxicology Research Collaboration, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia. Darren.Roberts@anu.edu.au
Emma Southcott
Julia M Potter
Michael S Roberts
Michael Eddleston
Nick A Buckley
Australian National University · AUCanberra Hospital · AUUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust 063560Wellcome Trust 071669Wellcome Trust GR063560MAWellcome Trust GR071669MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intentional self-poisonings with seeds from the yellow oleander tree (Thevetia peruviana) are widely reported. Activated charcoal has been suggested to benefit patients with yellow oleander poisoning by reducing absorption and/or facilitating elimination. Two recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of activated charcoal yielded conflicting outcomes in terms of mortality. The effect of activated charcoal on the pharmacokinetics of Thevetia cardenolides has not been assessed. This information may be useful for determining whether further studies are necessary. Serial blood samples were obtained from patients enrolled in an RCT assessing the relative efficacy of single-dose and multiple-dose activated charcoal (SDAC and MDAC, respectively) compared with no activated charcoal (NoAC). The concentration of Thevetia cardenolides was estimated with a digoxin immunoassay. The effect of activated charcoal on cardenolide pharmacokinetics was compared between treatment groups by determining the area under the curve for each patient in the 24 hours following admission, the 24-hour mean residence time, and regression lines obtained from serial concentration points, adjusted for exposure. Erratic and prolonged absorption patterns were noted in each patient group. The apparent terminal half-life was highly variable, with a median time of 42.9 hours. There was a reduction in 24-hour mean residence time and in the apparent terminal half-life estimated from linear regression in patients administered activated charcoal, versus the control group (NoAC). This effect was approximately equal in patients administered MDAC or SDAC. Activated charcoal appears to favorably influence the pharmacokinetic profile of Thevetia cardenolides in patients with acute self-poisoning and may have clinical benefits. Given the conflicting clinical outcomes noted in previous RCTs, these mechanistic data support the need for further studies to determine whether a particular subgroup of patients (eg, those presenting soon after poisoning) will benefit from activated charcoal.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAdolescentAdultCardenolidesCharcoalCross ReactionsDigoxinFemaleHalf-LifeHumansMaleThevetiaCardenolidesCharcoalDigoxin

Identifiers

PMID17164695
PMCPMC2296884
OpenAlexW2020017961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.