Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17164206›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2007

Selection against males in Caenorhabditis elegans under two mutational treatments.

Diogo Manoel, Sara Carvalho, Patrick C Phillips, Henrique Teotónio

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Evolution of sex ratio through gene loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The ecology of sexual reproduction.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2014
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diogo ManoelCentro de Biologia do Desenvolvimento, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Apartado 14, 2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal.
Sara Carvalho
Patrick C Phillips
Henrique Teotónio

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within populations with mixed mating systems, selfing is expected to be favoured over outcrossing unless a countervailing process such as severe inbreeding depression is present. In this study, we consider the relationship between the expression of deleterious alleles and the maintenance of outcrossing in the nematode species, Caenorhabditis elegans. This species is characterized by an androdioecious breeding system composed of males at low frequency and self-fertilizing hermaphrodites that can only outcross via males. Here, we find that experimentally increasing the mutational load in four different isogenic wild isolates using 10 generations of Ethylmethane sulphonate (EMS) and UV irradiation mutagenesis significantly diminishes the cost of males. Males are maintained at higher frequencies in mutagenized versus non-mutagenized populations. Nevertheless, males still tend to be driven to low frequencies within isolates that are known to be prone to lose males. Further, we determine the viability effects of a single round of mutagen exposure and find that, for EMS, outcrossing overcomes the almost completely recessive and nearly lethal effects generated. We briefly interpret our results in light of current evolutionary theory of outcrossing rates.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationInbreedingSelection, GeneticSex RatioAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansEthyl MethanesulfonateMaleMutagenesisMutationRegression AnalysisReproductionUltraviolet RaysEthyl Methanesulfonate

Identifiers

PMID17164206
PMCPMC1702385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.