Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17163986›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2006

The DNA-damage signature in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is associated with single-strand breaks in DNA.

Rebecca C Fry, Michael S DeMott, Joseph P Cosgrove, Thomas J Begley, Leona D Samson, Peter C Dedon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca C FryDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NE47-277, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. rfry@mit.edu <rfry@mit.edu>
Michael S DeMott
Joseph P Cosgrove
Thomas J Begley
Leona D Samson
Peter C Dedon
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USCenter for Environmental Health · USIIT@MIT · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · US

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LEVINE, STUART S · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
Global Responses to Aflatoxin B1 &Alkylating AgentsU19ES011399 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SAMSON, LEONA D. · 2001 to 2006
$7.4M
EUKARYTIC DNA ALKYLATION REPAIRR01CA055042 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SAMSON, LEONA D. · 1991 to 2010
$4.8M
Chemistry and Biology of Deoxyribose Oxidation in DNAR01CA103146 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DEDON, PETER C · 2003 to 2012
$3.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA103146NCI NIH HHS CA55042NCI NIH HHS R01 CA055042NCI NIH HHS R01 CA103146NIEHS NIH HHS ES002109NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109NIEHS NIH HHS U19 ES011399NIEHS NIH HHS U19-ES11399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpon exposure to agents that damage DNA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo widespread reprogramming of gene expression. Such a vast response may be due not only to damage to DNA but also damage to proteins, RNA, and lipids. Here the transcriptional response of S. cerevisiae specifically induced by DNA damage was discerned by exposing S. cerevisiae to a panel of three "radiomimetic" enediyne antibiotics (calicheamicin gamma1I, esperamicin A1 and neocarzinostatin) that bind specifically to DNA and generate varying proportions of single- and double-strand DNA breaks. The genome-wide responses were compared to those induced by the non-selective oxidant gamma-radiation.

resultsGiven well-controlled exposures that resulted in similar and minimal cell death (~20-25%) across all conditions, the extent of gene expression modulation was markedly different depending on treatment with the enediynes or gamma-radiation. Exposure to gamma-radiation resulted in more extensive transcriptional changes classified both by the number of genes modulated and the magnitude of change. Common biological responses were identified between the enediynes and gamma-radiation, with the induction of DNA repair and stress response genes, and the repression of ribosomal biogenesis genes. Despite these common responses, a fraction of the response induced by gamma radiation was repressed by the enediynes and vise versa, suggesting that the enediyne response is not entirely "radiomimetic." Regression analysis identified 55 transcripts with gene expression induction associated both with double- or single-strand break formation. The S. cerevisiae "DNA damage signature" genes as defined by Gasch et al. 1 were enriched among regulated transcripts associated with single-strand breaks, while genes involved in cell cycle regulation were associated with double-strand breaks.

conclusionDissection of the transcriptional response in yeast that is specifically signaled by DNA strand breaks has identified that single-strand breaks provide the signal for activation of transcripts encoding proteins involved in the DNA damage signature in S. cerevisiae, and double-strand breaks signal changes in cell cycle regulation genes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalCell Cycle ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairEnediynesGamma RaysGene Expression ProfilingGenome, FungalRegression AnalysisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription, GeneticCell Cycle ProteinsEnediynesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17163986
PMCPMC1764021
OpenAlexW2052917274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.