Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17163984›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2006

Nurse telephone triage in out-of-hours GP practice: determinants of independent advice and return consultation.

Eric Peter Moll van Charante, Gerben ter Riet, Sara Drost, Loes van der Linden, Niek S Klazinga, Patrick J E Bindels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. After-hours services in capitation-funded primary care practice: use and satisfaction.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2009
    Article
  12. Nurse practitioner management of acute in-hours home visit or assessment requests: a pilot study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric Peter Moll van CharanteDepartment of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.p.mollvancharante@amc.uva.nl
Gerben ter Riet
Sara Drost
Loes van der Linden
Niek S Klazinga
Patrick J E Bindels

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNowadays, nurses play a central role in telephone triage in Dutch out-of-hours primary care. The percentage of calls that is handled through nurse telephone advice alone (NTAA) appears to vary substantially between GP cooperatives. This study aims to explore which determinants are associated with NTAA and with subsequent return consultations to the GP.

methodsFor the ten most frequently presented problems, a two-week follow-up cohort study took place in one cooperative run by 25 GPs and 8 nurses, serving a population of 62,291 people. Random effects logistic regression analysis was used to study the determinants of NTAA and return consultation rates. The effect of NTAA on hospital referral rates was also studied as a proxy for severity of illness.

resultsThe mean NTAA rate was 27.5%--ranging from 15.5% to 39.4% for the eight nurses. It was higher during the night (RR 1.63, CI 1.48-1.76) and lower with increasing age (RR 0.96, CI 0.93-0.99, per ten years) or when the patient presented >2 problems (RR 0.65; CI 0.51-0.83). Using cough as reference category, NTAA was highest for earache (RR 1.49; CI 1.18-1.78) and lowest for chest pain (RR 0.18; CI 0.06-0.47). After correction for differences in case mix, significant variation in NTAA between nurses remained (p < 0.001). Return consultations after NTAA were higher after nightly calls (RR 1.23; CI 1.04-1.40). During first return consultations, the hospital referral rate after NTAA was 1.5% versus 3.8% for non-NTAA (difference -2.2%; CI -4.0 to -0.5).

conclusionImportant inter-nurse variability may indicate differences in perception on tasks and/or differences in skill to handle telephone calls alone. Future research should focus more on modifiable determinants of NTAA rates.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareTriageAdultAgedContinuity of Patient CareDiagnosis-Related GroupsFamily PracticeFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNursesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID17163984
PMCPMC1713241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.