ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2007
Metabolism of N-methyl, N-propargylphenylethylamine: studies with human liver microsomes and cDNA expressed cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes.
Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular characterization of CYP2B6 substrates.Current drug metabolism · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. We used an in vitro screening procedure and studies with individual human liver microsomes and cDNA-expressed CYP enzymes to investigate the metabolism of the putative neuroprotective drug N-methyl,N-propargyl-2-phenylethylamine (MPPE) to N-methylphenylethylamine (N-methylPEA) and N-propargylphenylethylamine (N-propargylPEA). 2. An electron-capture gas chromatographic procedure previously developed in our laboratories was used to measure the quantities of N-methylPEA and N-propargylPEA formed in the experiments with a single donor human liver microsome panel and cDNA expressed single CYP enzyme systems. The data were fitted to nonlinear regressions using Prism to determine kinetic constants. The results from a fluorogenic screen determined which cDNA-expressed single CYP enzymes were investigated. 3. CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 all contributed to the formation of N-methylPEA, while only CYP2B6 catalyzed the formation of N-propargylPEA. The K (M) and V (max) values for N-propargylPEA formation were 290 +/- 70 microM and 139+/-16 ng/mL/min. The values for formation of N-methylPEA were not determined from these experiments due to the complexity of fitting the data to a three-variable equation, but data on the time course of N-methylPEA formation are presented. 4. Catabolism of MPPE to N-methylPEA and N-propargylPEA is catalyzed by CYP enzymes. CYP2B6, 2C19 and 2D6 all contribute to the depropargylation of the parent compound, but only CYP2B6 also catalyzes demethylation. CYP2C19 was found to be the most active with respect to generation of N-methylPEA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.