Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17159147›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Nanoliter microfluidic hybrid method for simultaneous screening and optimization validated with crystallization of membrane proteins.

Liang Li, Debarshi Mustafi, Qiang Fu, Valentina Tereshko, Delai L Chen, Joshua D Tice, Rustem F Ismagilov

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Technical Scale in Biomolecular Crystallization.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Challenges of Protein-Protein Docking of the Membrane Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Integrated, Continuous Emulsion Creamer.Analytical chemistry · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Crystallization via tubing microfluidics permits both in situ and ex situ X-ray diffraction.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2017
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liang LiDepartment of Chemistry and Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Debarshi Mustafi
Qiang Fu
Valentina Tereshko
Delai L Chen
Joshua D Tice
Rustem F Ismagilov
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Sub-project 5U54GM074961 · NIGMS · EMERALD BIOSTRUCTURES · PI ISMAGILOV, RUSTEM F · 2005 to 2009
$19.3M
X-RAY STUDY OF HORMONE-RECEPTOR AND PROTEIN-ANTIBODY COMPLEXESP41RR007707 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI YANG, XIANGZHONG · 2002 to 2011
$17.3M
Enabling Nanoliter Membrane Protein Crystallization(RMI)R01GM075827 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ISMAGILOV, RUSTEM F · 2005 to 2009
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS Y1-CO-1020NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR007707NCRR NIH HHS RR07707NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075827NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM074961NIGMS NIH HHS Y1-GM-1104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput screening and optimization experiments are critical to a number of fields, including chemistry and structural and molecular biology. The separation of these two steps may introduce false negatives and a time delay between initial screening and subsequent optimization. Although a hybrid method combining both steps may address these problems, miniaturization is required to minimize sample consumption. This article reports a "hybrid" droplet-based microfluidic approach that combines the steps of screening and optimization into one simple experiment and uses nanoliter-sized plugs to minimize sample consumption. Many distinct reagents were sequentially introduced as approximately 140-nl plugs into a microfluidic device and combined with a substrate and a diluting buffer. Tests were conducted in approximately 10-nl plugs containing different concentrations of a reagent. Methods were developed to form plugs of controlled concentrations, index concentrations, and incubate thousands of plugs inexpensively and without evaporation. To validate the hybrid method and demonstrate its applicability to challenging problems, crystallization of model membrane proteins and handling of solutions of detergents and viscous precipitants were demonstrated. By using 10 microl of protein solution, approximately 1,300 crystallization trials were set up within 20 min by one researcher. This method was compatible with growth, manipulation, and extraction of high-quality crystals of membrane proteins, demonstrated by obtaining high-resolution diffraction images and solving a crystal structure. This robust method requires inexpensive equipment and supplies, should be especially suitable for use in individual laboratories, and could find applications in a number of areas that require chemical, biochemical, and biological screening and optimization.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularCrystallizationDetergentsMembrane ProteinsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesX-Ray DiffractionDetergentsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17159147
PMCPMC1748211
OpenAlexW2034386905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.