ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006
Nanoliter microfluidic hybrid method for simultaneous screening and optimization validated with crystallization of membrane proteins.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed, 242 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of substrate and product transfer between polydisperse microdroplets on biological high-throughput screens.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Technical Scale in Biomolecular Crystallization.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026Review
- Challenges of Protein-Protein Docking of the Membrane Proteins.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Role of hydrogen-bond networks on the donor side of photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Emerging platforms for high-throughput enzymatic bioassays.Trends in biotechnology · 2023Review
- Microfluidics for multiscale studies of biomolecular condensates.Lab on a chip · 2022Review
- Lipidic cubic phase serial femtosecond crystallography structure of a photosynthetic reaction centre.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022Article
- X-ray structure of theIUCrJ · 2022Article
- Plug-in tubes allow tunable oil removal, droplet packing, and reaction incubation for time-controlled droplet-based assays.Biomicrofluidics · 2021Article
- Microfluidic characterization of macromolecular liquid-liquid phase separation.Lab on a chip · 2020Article
- Article
- Room-temperature crystallography using a microfluidic protein crystal array device and its application to protein-ligand complex structure analysis.Chemical science · 2020Article
- Real-Time Measurement of Protein Crystal Growth Rates within the Microfluidic Device to Understand the Microspace Effect.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Continuous magnetic droplets and microfluidics: generation, manipulation, synthesis and detection.Mikrochimica acta · 2019Review
- Customizing droplet contents and dynamic ranges via integrated programmable picodroplet assembler.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2019Article
- Oscillating dispersed-phase co-flow microfluidic droplet generation: Multi-droplet size effect.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
- Article
- Integrated, Continuous Emulsion Creamer.Analytical chemistry · 2017Article
- Redox potentials of ubiquinone, menaquinone, phylloquinone, and plastoquinone in aqueous solution.Photosynthesis research · 2017Article
- Crystallization via tubing microfluidics permits both in situ and ex situ X-ray diffraction.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2017Article
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput screening and optimization experiments are critical to a number of fields, including chemistry and structural and molecular biology. The separation of these two steps may introduce false negatives and a time delay between initial screening and subsequent optimization. Although a hybrid method combining both steps may address these problems, miniaturization is required to minimize sample consumption. This article reports a "hybrid" droplet-based microfluidic approach that combines the steps of screening and optimization into one simple experiment and uses nanoliter-sized plugs to minimize sample consumption. Many distinct reagents were sequentially introduced as approximately 140-nl plugs into a microfluidic device and combined with a substrate and a diluting buffer. Tests were conducted in approximately 10-nl plugs containing different concentrations of a reagent. Methods were developed to form plugs of controlled concentrations, index concentrations, and incubate thousands of plugs inexpensively and without evaporation. To validate the hybrid method and demonstrate its applicability to challenging problems, crystallization of model membrane proteins and handling of solutions of detergents and viscous precipitants were demonstrated. By using 10 microl of protein solution, approximately 1,300 crystallization trials were set up within 20 min by one researcher. This method was compatible with growth, manipulation, and extraction of high-quality crystals of membrane proteins, demonstrated by obtaining high-resolution diffraction images and solving a crystal structure. This robust method requires inexpensive equipment and supplies, should be especially suitable for use in individual laboratories, and could find applications in a number of areas that require chemical, biochemical, and biological screening and optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.