Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17158933›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007

In vitro effects of antimicrobial agents on planktonic and biofilm forms of Staphylococcus lugdunensis clinical isolates.

Kristi L Frank, Emily J Reichert, Kerryl E Piper, Robin Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Antimicrobial Tolerance in Biofilms.Microbiology spectrum · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Endocarditis due to Staphylococcus lugdunensis-a retrospective national registry-based study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: antimicrobial susceptibility and optimal treatment options.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristi L FrankDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Emily J Reichert
Kerryl E Piper
Robin Patel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus lugdunensis is an atypically virulent coagulase-negative staphylococcal species associated with acute and destructive infections that often resemble Staphylococcus aureus infections. Several types of infection caused by S. lugdunensis (e.g., native valve endocarditis, prosthetic joint infection, and intravascular catheter infection) are associated with biofilm formation, which may lead to an inability to eradicate the infection due to the intrinsic nature of biofilms to resist high levels of antibiotics. In this study, planktonic MICs and MBCs and biofilm bactericidal concentrations of 10 antistaphylococcal antimicrobial agents were measured for 15 S. lugdunensis isolates collected from patients with endocarditis, medical device infections, or skin and soft tissue infections. Planktonic isolates were susceptible to all agents studied, but biofilms were resistant to high concentrations of most of the drugs. However, moxifloxacin was able to kill 73% of isolates growing in biofilms at </=0.5 mug/ml. Relative to the effect on cell density, subinhibitory concentrations of nafcillin substantially stimulated biofilm formation of most isolates, whereas tetracycline and linezolid significantly decreased biofilm formation in 93 and 80% of isolates, respectively. An unexpected outcome of MBC testing was the observation that vancomycin was not bactericidal against 93% of S. lugdunensis isolates, suggesting widespread vancomycin tolerance in this species. These data provide insights into the response of S. lugdunensis isolates when challenged with various levels of antimicrobial agents in clinical use.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesBiofilmsDNA, BacterialHumansLinezolidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNafcillinOxazolidinonesPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPenicillinsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcusAcetamidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesDNA, BacterialLinezolidmecA protein, Staphylococcus aureusNafcillinOxazolidinonesPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPenicillinsTetracycline

Identifiers

PMID17158933
PMCPMC1803120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.