Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17158901›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2007

Isolation and characterization of biofilm formation-defective mutants of Staphylococcus aureus.

Patrick H Tu Quoc, Pierre Genevaux, Maria Pajunen, Harri Savilahti, Costa Georgopoulos, Jacques Schrenzel, William L Kelley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Efflux pumps: gatekeepers of antibiotic resistance inMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Infection and immunity · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. A Review of Biofilm Formation ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efflux pump inhibitors: new updates.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Staphylococcal Biofilm Development: Structure, Regulation, and Treatment Strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The Impacts ofInfection and immunity · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Regulation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick H Tu QuocDivision of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, 24 rue Micheli-du-Crest, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland.
Pierre Genevaux
Maria Pajunen
Harri Savilahti
Costa Georgopoulos
Jacques Schrenzel
William L Kelley
University Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHBiocenter Finland · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus produces biofilm and this mode of colonization facilitates infections that are often difficult to treat and engender high morbidity and mortality. We have exploited bacteriophage Mu transposition methods to create an insertional mutant library in a highly biofilm-forming S. aureus clinical isolate. Our screen identified 38 insertions in 23 distinct genes together with one intergenic region that significantly reduced biofilm formation. Nineteen insertions were mapped in loci not previously known to affect biofilm in this organism. These include insertions in codY, srrA, mgrA, and fmtA, a putative DEAD-box helicase, two members of the zinc-metallo-beta lactamase/beta-CASP family, and a hypothetical protein with a GGDEF motif. Fifteen insertions occurred in the icaADBC operon, which produces intercellular adhesion antigen (PIA) and is important for biofilm formation in many strains of S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Obtaining a high proportion of independent Em-Mu disruptions in icaADBC demonstrated both the importance of PIA for biofilm formation in this clinical strain and the strong validation of the screening procedure that concomitantly uncovered additional mutants. All non-ica mutants were further analyzed by immunoblotting and biochemical fractionation for perturbation of PIA and wall teichoic acid. PIA levels were diminished in the majority of non-ica insertional mutants. Three mutant strains were chosen and were functionally complemented for restored biofilm formation by transformation with plasmids carrying the cloned wild-type gene under the control of a xylose-inducible promoter. This is a comprehensive collection of biofilm-defective mutants that underscores the multifactorial genetic program underlying the establishment of biofilm in this insidious pathogen.

Indexed as

Mutagenesis, InsertionalBiofilmsDNA Transposable ElementsStaphylococcus aureusDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID17158901
PMCPMC1828571
OpenAlexW2136739054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.