Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17158702›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2006

DNA replication in the archaea.

Elizabeth R Barry, Stephen D Bell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hachiman is a genome integrity sensor.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. On the origin of the nucleus: a hypothesis.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Open biology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Genetic Control of Oxidative Mutagenesis inJournal of bacteriology · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Genomic Insights of "Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Initiating DNA replication: a matter of prime importance.Biochemical Society transactions · 2019
    Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth R BarryMRC Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, United Kingdom.
Stephen D Bell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The archaeal DNA replication machinery bears striking similarity to that of eukaryotes and is clearly distinct from the bacterial apparatus. In recent years, considerable advances have been made in understanding the biochemistry of the archaeal replication proteins. Furthermore, a number of structures have now been obtained for individual components and higher-order assemblies of archaeal replication factors, yielding important insights into the mechanisms of DNA replication in both archaea and eukaryotes.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenome, ArchaealArchaeaCarrier ProteinsDNA, ArchaealDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseGene Expression Regulation, ArchaealCarrier ProteinsDNA, ArchaealDNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID17158702
PMCPMC1698513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.