Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17158153›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2007

An efficient method for multi-locus molecular haplotyping.

Bernard A Konfortov, Alan T Bankier, Paul H Dear

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole-genome haplotyping by dilution, amplification, and sequencing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Completely phased genome sequencing through chromosome sorting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernard A KonfortovMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK.
Alan T Bankier
Paul H Dear
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105131672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many methods exist for genotyping--revealing which alleles an individual carries at different genetic loci. A harder problem is haplotyping--determining which alleles lie on each of the two homologous chromosomes in a diploid individual. Conventional approaches to haplotyping require the use of several generations to reconstruct haplotypes within a pedigree, or use statistical methods to estimate the prevalence of different haplotypes in a population. Several molecular haplotyping methods have been proposed, but have been limited to small numbers of loci, usually over short distances. Here we demonstrate a method which allows rapid molecular haplotyping of many loci over long distances. The method requires no more genotypings than pedigree methods, but requires no family material. It relies on a procedure to identify and genotype single DNA molecules, and reconstruction of long haplotypes by a 'tiling' approach. We demonstrate this by resolving haplotypes in two regions of the human genome, harbouring 20 and 105 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, respectively. The method can be extended to reconstruct haplotypes of arbitrary complexity and length, and can make use of a variety of genotyping platforms. We also argue that this method is applicable in situations which are intractable to conventional approaches.

Indexed as

HaplotypesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Chromosomes, Human, XData Interpretation, StatisticalDiploidyDNAHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNA

Identifiers

PMID17158153
PMCPMC1802573
OpenAlexW2079641200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.