Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17157042›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2006

Signaling during lens regeneration.

Matthew W Grogg, Mindy K Call, Panagiotis A Tsonis

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular and cellular aspects of amphibian lens regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2010
    Article
  9. Gene expression profiles of lens regeneration and development in Xenopus laevis.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2009
    Article
  10. Regeneration: The origin of cancer or a possible cure?Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew W GroggLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469-2320, USA.
Mindy K Call
Panagiotis A Tsonis
University of Dayton · US

Funding

GENE REGULATION IN LENS REGENERATIONR01EY010540 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON · PI TSONIS, PANAGIOTIS A · 1995 to 2013
$3.3M
NEI NIH HHS EY10540NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The newt is one of the few organisms that is able to undergo lens regeneration as an adult. This review will examine the signaling pathways that are involved in this amazing phenomenon. In addition to outlining the current research involved in elucidating the key signaling molecules in lens regeneration, we will also highlight some of the similarities and differences between lens regeneration and development.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLens, CrystallineRegenerationSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID17157042
PMCPMC1828075
OpenAlexW2066186150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.