Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17156441›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2006

Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility?

Aurora Ruiz-Herrera, Jose Castresana, Terence J Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Random, fragile, or correlated: Mechanisms of synteny decay in mammals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The burst of satellite DNA in Leptidea wood white butterflies and their putative role in karyotype evolution.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Safeguarding DNA Replication: A Golden Touch of MiDAS and Other Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Genomic Organization of Microsatellites andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Mind the replication gap.Royal Society open science · 2021
    Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurora Ruiz-HerreraEvolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany & Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
Jose Castresana
Terence J Robinson
Stellenbosch University · ZAConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA fundamental question in comparative genomics concerns the identification of mechanisms that underpin chromosomal change. In an attempt to shed light on the dynamics of mammalian genome evolution, we analyzed the distribution of syntenic blocks, evolutionary breakpoint regions, and evolutionary breakpoints taken from public databases available for seven eutherian species (mouse, rat, cattle, dog, pig, cat, and horse) and the chicken, and examined these for correspondence with human fragile sites and tandem repeats.

resultsOur results confirm previous investigations that showed the presence of chromosomal regions in the human genome that have been repeatedly used as illustrated by a high breakpoint accumulation in certain chromosomes and chromosomal bands. We show, however, that there is a striking correspondence between fragile site location, the positions of evolutionary breakpoints, and the distribution of tandem repeats throughout the human genome, which similarly reflect a non-uniform pattern of occurrence.

conclusionThese observations provide further evidence that certain chromosomal regions in the human genome have been repeatedly used in the evolutionary process. As a consequence, the genome is a composite of fragile regions prone to reorganization that have been conserved in different lineages, and genomic tracts that do not exhibit the same levels of evolutionary plasticity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosome Fragile SitesChromosomesGenomeAnimalsChromosome BandingHumansSpecies SpecificityTandem Repeat Sequences

Identifiers

PMID17156441
PMCPMC1794428
OpenAlexW2105059192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.