ReviewPaediatric drugs2006
Acute otitis media in children aged less than 2 years: drug treatment issues.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The role of DNA sensing and innate immune receptor TLR9 in otitis media.Innate immunity · 2012Article
- Innate signaling in otitis media: pathogenesis and recovery.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2011Review
- The toll-Like receptor adaptor TRIF contributes to otitis media pathogenesis and recovery.BMC immunology · 2009Article
- TLR4-mediated induction of TLR2 signaling is critical in the pathogenesis and resolution of otitis media.Innate immunity · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of acute otitis media (AOM) in childhood has evolved considerably during recent years as a result of the new insights provided by publication (in 2004) of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians guidelines for the treatment of AOM. The new treatment guidelines establish a clear hierarchy among the various antibacterials used in the treatment of this disease and also the use of an age-stratified approach to AOM by recommending an observation strategy ('watchful waiting') without the use of antibacterials for some groups of patients with AOM. Infants and young children aged <2 years represent a target population characterized by a high incidence of AOM (and in particular of recurrent disease), lack of anatomic and physiologic maturity of airways, age-related immune humoral and cellular deficiencies, the presence of antibacterial-resistant pathogens, and a less efficient response to antibacterial treatment. Presently, the evidence accumulated in the literature is not sufficient to conclude that the role of antibacterials is only minimal in the management of AOM and that the watchful waiting policy is the most appropriate choice for patients aged <2 years with a certain AOM diagnosis. However, adherence to such a policy in patients with an uncertain or questionable AOM diagnosis and/or mild-to-moderate symptoms, in addition to its implementation in patients aged >2 years, could reduce substantially the use of antibacterials in children and play a major role in the strategy of decreasing antibacterial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.