ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2007
Central charged residues in DIIIS4 regulate deactivation gating in skeletal muscle sodium channels.
Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Charge immobilization of skeletal muscle Na+ channels: role of residues in the inactivation linker.Biophysical journal · 2007Article
- Central charged residues in DIIIS4 regulate deactivation gating in skeletal muscle sodium channels.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2007Article
- Open- and closed-state fast inactivation in sodium channels: differential effects of a site-3 anemone toxin.Channels (Austin, Tex.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Mutations in the S4 segment of domain III in the voltage gated skeletal muscle sodium channel hNa(V)1.4 were constructed to test the roles of each charged residue in deactivation gating. Mutations comprised charge reversals at K1-R6, charge neutralization, and substitution at R4 and R5. 2. Charge-reversing mutations at R4 and R5 produced the greatest alteration of activation parameters compared to hNa(V)1.4. Effects included depolarization of the conductance/voltage (g/V) curve, decreased valence and slowing of kinetics. 3. Reversal of charge at R2 to R4 hyperpolarized, and reversal at R5 or R6 depolarized the h (infinity) curve. Most DIIIS4 mutations slowed inactivation from the open state. R4E slowed closed state fast inactivation and R5E inhibited its completion .4. Deactivation from the open and/or inactivated state was prolonged in mutations reversing charge at R2 to R4 but accelerated by reversal of charge at R5 or R6. Effects were most pronounced at central charges R4 and R5. 5. Charge and structure each contribute to effects of mutations at R4 and R5 on channel gating. Effects of mutations on activation and deactivation at R4 and, to a lesser extent R5, were primarily owing to charge alteration, whereas effects on fast inactivation were charge independent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.