Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17151933›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2007

Survivin subcellular localization in high-grade astrocytomas: simultaneous expression in both nucleus and cytoplasm is negative prognostic marker.

Taiichi Saito, Muhamad Thohar Arifin, Seiji Hama, Yoshinori Kajiwara, Kazuhiko Sugiyama, Fumiyuki Yamasaki, Toshikazu Hidaka, Kazunori Arita, Kaoru Kurisu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taiichi SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. taiichi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
Muhamad Thohar Arifin
Seiji Hama
Yoshinori Kajiwara
Kazuhiko Sugiyama
Fumiyuki Yamasaki
Toshikazu Hidaka
Kazunori Arita
Kaoru Kurisu
Hiroshima University · JPKagoshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSubcellularly localized (nuclear and/or cytoplasmic) survivin has various functions, and correlates with prognosis of malignant tumors. However, there have been no reports about the significance of subcellularly localized survivin in high-grade astrocytomas. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between prognosis and subcellular localization of survivin in high-grade astrocytoma.

methodsWe immunohistochemically examined the pattern of subcellular localization of survivin expression (nuclear, cytoplasmic, or both) in 51 patients with high-grade astrocytoma (19 anaplastic astrocytomas; 32 glioblastomas). We statistically examined the relationship between survivin localization and prognosis, using multivariate analysis including other clinicopathological factors (age, sex, WHO grade, extent of resection, MIB-1 labeling index, and expression of p53 and epidermal growth factor receptor).

resultsAll specimens stained positive for survivin: localized in nucleus only (nuclear-positive group), 10 cases (20%); localized in cytoplasm only (cytoplasmic-positive group), 23 cases (45%); simultaneous expression in nucleus and cytoplasm (nuclear-cytoplasmic group), 19 cases (35%). There was no significant difference in prognosis between the nuclear-positive group and cytoplasmic-positive group (P=0.796). However, the nuclear-cytoplasmic group had significantly shorter overall survival than the nuclear-positive group and the cytoplasmic-positive group (P<0.0001).

conclusionsWe found that simultaneous expression of survivin in both the nucleus and cytoplasm is an important prognostic factor for high-grade astrocytoma. The present findings indicate that subcellular localization of survivin expression is a reliable prognostic factor for patients with this tumor.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsCell NucleusCytoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsBIRC5 protein, humanepidermal growth factor receptor-neu receptorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsSurvivinTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID17151933
OpenAlexW2057512984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.