ArticleGenetics2007
The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXVI. Molecular structural analysis of Osvaldo retrotransposon insertions in colonizing populations unveils drift effects in founder events.
Article in Genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A roadmap to key traits of invasive Drosophilidae.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Evolutionary history of the Azteca-like mariner transposons and their host ants.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2015Article
- The genomic proliferation of transposable elements in colonizing populations: Schistosoma mansoni in the new world.Genetica · 2015Article
- Molecular characterization of the piggyBac-like element, a candidate marker for phylogenetic research of Chilo suppressalis (Walker) in China.BMC molecular biology · 2014Article
- Article
- Osvaldo and Isis retrotransposons as markers of the Drosophila buzzatii colonisation in Australia.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- Distribution of the transposable elements bilbo and gypsy in original and colonizing populations of Drosophila subobscura.BMC evolutionary biology · 2008Article
- High genetic differentiation between the M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae in Africa.PloS one · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous work on transposable element distribution in colonizing populations of Drosophila buzzatii revealed a high frequency of occupancy in several chromosomal sites. Two explanatory hypotheses were advanced: the founder hypothesis, by which founder genetic drift was responsible, and the unstable hypothesis that assigns this unusual distribution to bursts of transposition toward some chromosomal sites. Here, we study the molecular structure of three euchromatic Osvaldo clones isolated from sites occupied at high (A4 and B9) and low frequency (B4) in colonizing populations, to test these hypotheses. Large insertions, duplications, and indels in the Osvaldo coding region and LTR were detected in the A4 clone and a truncated Osvaldo with many substitutions was found in the B9 clone. These altered sequences indicate that the two copies of this retroelement are precolonization insertions. Interestingly, the LTR of the A4 clone and the reverse transcriptase region of B9 show identical sequences in all colonizing populations indicating, most probably, that they are identical by descent. Moreover, Osvaldo is inserted at the same nucleotide site in all colonizing populations. On the other hand an almost identical LTR sequence, except by 1 base deletion, was found in the B4 clone compared to the canonical active Osvaldo element. These results suggest that Osvaldo copies in highly occupied sites are, most probably, identical by descent and strongly favor the founder hypothesis. On the other hand, low-insertion-frequency sites could represent recent transposition events. This work emphasizes the importance of molecular population studies to disentangle the effects of genetic drift and transposition in colonization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.