Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17151203›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2007

Comparison of multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and phage typing for subtype analysis of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis.

D Boxrud, K Pederson-Gulrud, J Wotton, C Medus, E Lyszkowicz, J Besser, J M Bartkus

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Outbreak investigations ofEpidemiology and infection · 2024
    Article
  4. Whole-Genome Analysis of Multidrug-ResistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Subtyping β-lactamase-producingIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Genomic Comparison ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Genetic diversity ofAIMS microbiology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multi-laboratory validation study of multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, 2015.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2017
    Article
  16. Phenotypic and Genotypic Eligible Methods forFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D BoxrudMinnesota Department of Health, 601 Robert Street N., P.O. Box 64899, Saint Paul, MN 55164-0899, USA. dave.boxrud@health.state.mn.us
K Pederson-Gulrud
J Wotton
C Medus
E Lyszkowicz
J Besser
J M Bartkus

Funding

PHS HHS U60-CCU303019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strain subtyping is an important tool for detection of outbreaks caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. Current subtyping methods, however, yield less than optimal subtype discrimination. In this study, we describe the development and evaluation of a multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) method for subtyping Salmonella serotype Enteritidis. The discrimination ability and epidemiological concordance of MLVA were compared with those of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and phage typing. MLVA provided greater discrimination among non-epidemiologically linked isolates than did PFGE or phage typing. Epidemiologic concordance was evaluated by typing 40 isolates from four food-borne disease outbreaks. MLVA, PFGE, and, to a lesser extent, phage typing exhibited consistent subtypes within an outbreak. MLVA was better able to differentiate isolates between the individual outbreaks than either PFGE or phage typing. The reproducibility of MLVA was evaluated by subtyping sequential isolates from an infected individual and by testing isolates following multiple passages and freeze-thaw cycles. PFGE and MLVA patterns were reproducible for isolates that were frozen and passaged multiple times. However, 2 of 12 sequential isolates obtained from an individual over the course of 36 days had an MLVA type that differed at one locus and one isolate had a different phage type. Overall, MLVA typing of Salmonella serotype Enteritidis had enhanced resolution, good reproducibility, and good epidemiological concordance. These results indicate that MLVA may be a useful tool for detection and investigation of outbreaks caused by Salmonella serotype Enteritidis.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksBacterial Typing TechniquesBacteriophage TypingElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldHumansMinisatellite RepeatsReproducibility of ResultsSalmonella enteritidisSalmonella Infections

Identifiers

PMID17151203
PMCPMC1829081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.