Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17148706›Full record

ArticlePostgraduate medical journal2006

Evidence-based medicine: assessment of knowledge of basic epidemiological and research methods among medical doctors.

L Novack, A Jotkowitz, B Knyazer, V Novack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postgraduate medical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Diagnosing Statistical Education Needs of Health Science Learners.Journal of statistics and data science education : an official journal of the of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Blinding in Clinical Trials: Seeing the Big Picture.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Statistical competencies for medical research learners: What is fundamental?Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017
    Article
  14. What Do Anesthesiologists Know aboutAnesthesiology research and practice · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L NovackDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Services Evaluation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University in the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
A Jotkowitz
B Knyazer
V Novack

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn understanding of statistical methods and basic epidemiology are crucial for the practice of modern medicine.

aimsTo assess (1) the knowledge of basic methods of conducting research and data analysis among residents and practicing doctors and (2) the effect of country of medical school graduation, professional status, medical article reading and writing experience on the level of this knowledge.

methodsData were collected by means of a supervised self-administered questionnaire, which was distributed among doctors at Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel. The questionnaire included 10 multiple-choice questions on basic epidemiology and statistics, and respondent demographical data.

resultsOf the 260 eligible doctors, 219 (84.2%) returned completed questionnaires. Of the 219 doctors, 50% graduated more than 8.5 years ago, 39.7% were specialists and the remaining were residents. The most frequent specialty was internal medicine (37.4%). Israel was the most frequent country of graduation (45.7%), followed by the former Soviet Union (Eastern medical education; 38.4%). The median total score of knowledge was 4 of 10 questions (interquartile range 2-6). A higher score was associated with a Western medical education, being a specialist, shorter elapsed time since graduation, higher number of publications and self-reported reading of "methods" and "discussion" sections in scientific articles.

conclusionThis study found a low level of knowledge of basic principles of research methods and data analysis among doctors, and this knowledge considerably differed by country of medical school graduation.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEpidemiologyEvidence-Based MedicineInternship and ResidencyIsraelPhysiciansResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID17148706
PMCPMC2653930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.