Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17148634›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Measuring continuity of care in diabetes mellitus: an experience-based measure.

Martin C Gulliford, Smriti Naithani, Myfanwy Morgan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Patients' views on interactions with practitioners for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal qualitative study in primary care over 10 years.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of a patient-reported continuity of care model for older adults.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How should continuity of care in primary health care be assessed?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin C GullifordDivision of Health and Social Care, Research, King's College, London, UK. martin.gulliford@kcl.ac.uk
Smriti Naithani
Myfanwy Morgan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContinuity is an important attribute of health care, but appropriate measures are not currently available. We developed an experience-based measure of continuity of care in type 2 diabetes.

methodsA 19-item measure of experienced continuity of care for diabetes mellitus (ECC-DM) was developed from qualitative patient interview data with 4 continuity subdomains: longitudinal, flexible, relational, and team and cross-boundary continuity. The measure was implemented in a survey of 193 patients with type 2 diabetes from 19 family practices. Associations of ECC-DM scores with clinician organizational characteristics were estimated.

resultsPotential ECC-DM scores ranged from 0 to 100 with an observed mean of 62.1 (SD 16.0). The average inter-item correlation was 0.343 and Cronbach's alpha was 0.908. Factor analysis found 4 factors that were generally consistent with the proposed subdomains. Patients' mean scores varied significantly between practices (P = .001), ranging from 46 to 78 at different family practices. Experienced continuity was lower for patients receiving only hospital clinic care than for those receiving some diabetes care from their family practice (difference 13.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.2-19.2; P <.001). Patients had higher ECC-DM scores if their family practice had a designated lead doctor for diabetes (difference 8.2; 95% CI, 2.7-13.6; P = .003).

conclusionsThe results provide evidence for the reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the experienced continuity-of-care measure. The measure may be used in research and monitoring to evaluate patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care. Patients' experiences of continuity of care vary between health care organizations and are influenced by the organizational arrangements for care.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Factor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID17148634
PMCPMC1687166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.